"Law enforcement and organisations with designated regulatory powers and functions must be able to access all content hosted and streamed by pornography platforms for investigative and enforcement purposes," notes another recommendation.
Lmfao so the true purpose is free porn for cops.
Yeah I know, the post is reasonable. If the government pays for the bags, anyway.
The comment I replied to was making out that having kids lock their phones away during class was akin to denying them access to any knowledge that might contradict the teacher.
Be the change you want to see. Reddit Secret Santa was always a pretty big logistical undertaking, it would take effort to make a Fediverse one.
Also Fediverse users might be less keen on the idea generally, as it involves personal information and addresses. A very cynical take is that harvesting this data was the real purpose of the Reddit SS, which can't really be ruled out.
Secret Santa is where a group of people all get given the name of one other person, and they have to buy them a Christmas gift in secret. Someone else will buy them a gift, but no one (usually) knows who got them their gift.
Reddit Secret Santa was just the same, but on reddit, and instead of being among a small group of local friends (eg an office) it was done internationally.
Lmao you think kids sit on their phones scrolling through ebooks or something?
Cathinones are the "designer drugs" of like the 70s and 80s that are somewhat similar to amphetamines, but maybe more of a stimulant.
Well at least he isn't breaking any election campaign promises.
Freedom of Information Act 2000
This website has a good history of freedom of information laws in the UK.
Court records are typically publicly available, unless the judge seals it. There is usually an administrative cost to access court records.
Lmao I doubt you could even read that much without getting distracted and wandering off somewhere else.
This is in England.
Surely the law doesn’t require them to hire someone to police the toilets.
It pretty much does. Not specifically to have someone dedicated to check everyone, but they have to take reasonable measures and a member of staff speaking up would fall under that.
What is this “cautiosness” she’s talking about?
The law requires businesses to police toilets somewhat.