[+] -24 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You're supposed to act like a human being. If she's afraid of you because she'd rather be with a bear, that's her issue. Forget her. She doesn't owe you anything. Not her attention or her company. Move the fuck on.

And that's where I know you're full of shit. Who says anyone's supposed to care about or do what's good for the species? And why is it always the women who have to make concessions? Why can't the men stop being rapists for the good of the species?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -7 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    It isn't though. It's a thing that makes shit. And it makes shit well enough that execs seriously consider it. Even though it can only make a commercial 60% as good as humans can, that's good enough. Because AI can make 10 commercials in the same time traditional creators can make 1. It doesn't matter how bad the ai commercials are because they can overwhelm any competition in sheer abundance. AI ads will drown out traditional ads. They are easier to make and are infinitely customisable. I can make 10 new ads a day for less than it would cost to make a single traditional ad. There really is no comparison

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago

    Idk. I think it's just easier to rely on a specific someone whose job it is to put shit in the proper place than to hope every random person who takes a book off the shelf can put it back in the proper place. Like, I get what you're saying. It isn't a big ask to have people return a book after looking at it. But it's so easy for them to put it in the wrong spot. And once it's on the shelf, it's much harder to notice that it's out of place. It seems counter intuitive, but it's more efficient to simply leave the book out after looking at it

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›