[–] 4 points 1 year ago

They really don't and those who do get shut out of leadership positions as a threat to their donors. The donor-based democrats are more interested in innovating ways to tell their constituents how to vote and the PR firms they're hiring are selling them fumes.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I've considtently cooked better rice on my stove than any rice cooker. It takes more practice to dial in but once you've got it, its better than a rice cooker.

    ProTip you can just pick up the pot, hold the lid down and flip it to see if there's too much or too little water left.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Yeah news is supposed to be objective and you were basically posting an opinion piece. Its a silly rule that every news thread has to be laundered through some "objective journalist institution" instead of just posting direct sources.

    Jordan was definitely thought policing you though. He made it obvious when he argued against it while also banning it.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    Not reading through the entire modlog but from the initial thread you were labelling everyone who disagreed with you FBI. Fed Jacketting is Grade A wrecker behavior earnest or not.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    For 2. it would be a piece of journalism not a call to action. "Group X calls to impeach trump" is news. Posting group x's call to impeach directly is not. The (alleged) lack of the authors opinion is what matters.

    Its a very subtle and pedantic difference IMO. FWIW Jordan has even more arbitrary definitions of what is news and what is a blog.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›