She should try my method.

Plan to have slightly later in case traffic is good, and then actually have just after work starts.

I can't imagine that actually pays enough to live though does it? My impression has been that in order to live off of OF you either need to find a niche that most aren't willing to do or be really popular.

A nuanced take on Reddit is pretty much a guarantee of downvotes and arguments against things your weren't saying

I've had poor luck with it's debugging, where I think it shines right now is when I need to code something that's basically standalone iin a language I don't really know.

Give me git hook to X or right a bash script to Y.

This is a problem for a ton of developers today. In my last round of interviews I heard a lot of consternation from people who were perfectly capable during the code review about their newly discovered inability to write code without AI.

The code review has always been a bigger hurdle than the writing in the past.

You won't know that it's costing you jobs.

This is the kind of thing that would lose them support of a lot of the police. It would still be a right wing military based in the city, but right wing ≠ maga

I don't think they have a chance of holding just NYC but I think every major US city would suddenly be in open revolt if they did this.

I can really see going after the ones who started it in the case you mentioned, even though their guy died. That feels like a tough row to hoe for the persecution, though.

I wonder o of the jury would have more likely to convict if it was a bystander who died.

IANAL and I'm not real clear on DC law but I think the argument was that Mr ice felt like he was being attacked because of the sandwich, not that the sandwich was causing real harm. So even though there was contact the throwing of the sandwich was a threat, making it assault.

This wasn't nullification. The sandwich throw clearly isn't assault. No crime was committed here.

Clearly the other two were crimes. I'm skeptical they have the right guy for either, but I haven't seen the evidence and the jury will.

The jury I was on the things that the officer said about the video were blatantly false. In the beginning he was lying about irrelevant things, and be the end he was lying about exactly the charge.