@sc_griffith @BlueMonday1984 die bewerten also nicht mehr nach Menge Code, sondern Kot? 💩

@frezik @dgerard but when did they ever even identify an actual problem?

@swlabr @lagrangeinterpolator Rat calvinism lol

@dgerard @Squeebah at least there's not much to review :D

@Architeuthis @froztbyte if someone built, say, social housing with money from the US government, I wouldn't care who was currently president. Guns guns guns, WMDs and Gestapo recruiting, OTOH 😬(As long as they deliver, and aren't just lining their pockets, ofc)

@mawhrin Well, i didn't bother to dig into that. But also, I've heard rumors about a "web page" of sorts ... Unless that got scrapped 🙃

@BlueMonday1984 @themagzuz I had to look it up, and (beyond that fashhole DHH)> Omarchy [...] ships with what a modern software developer would need to be productive immediately, including [...] Spotify, [...] and Zoom.Yes, those are the productivity essentials for any programmer 🤪

@nightsky @Architeuthis the kid's not wrong, though 😭

@mlen @Soyweiser * für e [...] 🤓

@o7___o7 @bitofhope it is the cum sprite!"Splash on your tits?"

@diz OK, that would have prevented any escape 🙃

@HedyL @diz I kinda wonder if this would work better if it just was worded the other way round: "must be supervised always"If I understand correctly, LLMs have difficulties encoding negative correlations (not, un-, ...)Edit: or maybe not, seeing it did this transformation already in the introduction and still lets the dog escape on the very first turn