And what of the claims made in this post? Just blindly go with it?
Yes, claimant. It doesn't have to be a court of law for a word to have a meaning. When a person makes a claim, they are a claimant. I've always understood this to be plain English. It's exhausting when everyone wants to make pedantic arguments rather than discuss the topic. Are they encrypted or are they not? Let's answer the question and then we can have a Socratic debate about it.
Sounds like a great way to curate a list of homelab targets. I'm good, thanks.
The burden of proof is on the claimant. In this case, the claim is that they are neither encrypted nor secure. The claim can be made from both sides but if neither provides proof then we're all just tinfoil hats.
How do you know they aren't?
Huh...I've always heard "giraffe pussy." Lol I never thought about it the other way.
Did I not ask a question? I believe I asked what harm was being done. So, yes, I just asked a question.
Why in the hell would you build an operation that requires biblical levels of water in a drought prone area? It seems the harm being done is more incompetence than actual malice.
I mean the fact that you feel baited says a lot. All I did was ask a question. Damn you guys are feisty here.
How are you getting email across 25?
I mean you'll say it out loud but you won't articulate it? Sounds like you're just parroting what you've heard and don't actually know anything about the subject. That's fair.
What's the harm being done?
view more:
next ›