[–] 63 points 1 year ago (10 children)

The last I read, de minimis still applied. I didn't know until now that was done with.

As an avid collector of vinyl records: FUCK! I've got no problem sending $50 to a European artist who's selling a limited run of records out of their living room. Hell, if it's an artist I really like, I'll spend $70. I'm not about to spend $70 and the artist get half of it.

Spending ludicrous amounts of cash of 12-inch pieces of plastic is totally fine with me, but I want my money going to the artist who's making the music I love, not a government I voted against.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Do you have any programming experience?

    Whisper.cpp is fairly easy to use, there are plenty of open source libraries for audio input, and sending text as keystrokes in Windows is quite easy.

    There may very well be an existing solution, but if you want to put something together yourself, all the major building blocks already exist. You'd just have to write the code to tie it all together.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    No, not really. I just can't stand musicals. It doesn't matter how good an episode or movie is otherwise, I just can't enjoy musicals.

    I also didn't want to completely skip the episode and miss any plot points, so mute with subtitles worked nicely.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 60 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I have to wonder if NPUs are just going to eventually become a normal part of the instruction set.

    When SIMD was first becoming a thing, it was advertised as accelerating "multimedia," as that was the hot buzzword of the 1990s. Now, SIMD instructions are used everywhere, any place there is a benefit from processing an array of values in parallel.

    I could see NPUs becoming the same. Developers start using NPU instructions, and the compiler can "NPU-ify" scalar code when it thinks it's appropriate.

    NPUs are advertised for "AI," but they're really just a specialized math coprocessor. I don't really see this as a bad thing to have. Surely there are plenty of other uses.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So many people completely miss the mark when it comes to AI and coding. It's great for code reviews on code you wrote yourself, and it can be handy when you're developing code for a domain you don't have much experience in.

    What it is not good for is writing code on its own. Not if you want your code to be efficient, or performant, work correctly, or even compile.

  • source
  • view more: next ›