Proton is working on a beta for Drive on Linux:

We are working towards releasing a beta of the official Proton Drive app for Linux. The initial launch will likely consist of our headless daemon mode only, meaning you’ll have a sync engine running that keeps a configurable list of directories up to date the same way it does on Mac and Windows.


cross posted from: https://programming.dev/post/58028970

 

Proton is working on a beta for Drive on Linux:

We are working towards releasing a beta of the official Proton Drive app for Linux. The initial launch will likely consist of our headless daemon mode only, meaning you’ll have a sync engine running that keeps a configurable list of directories up to date the same way it does on Mac and Windows.

[–] [S] 1 point 3 weeks ago

Privacy and Security may also depend on the server where the AI model is runnig. Having a 3rd party tool using the API is a nice thing for sure. But OpenAI will still use the prompt data and sell that (if someone inputs sensitive information. So privacy gone. For security similar.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    don't say manjaro could be better.

    • it works.... most of the time until it doesn't
    • it looks nice .... until you update something and it breaks
    • it has many features... which you don't need by default
    • it can be customized easily.... if you just want basics
    • it is stable.... until you update something

    but i love it and use it daily

  • source
  • [–] 140 points 9 months ago (26 children)

    you can activate any windows or office by using vlmcsd (https://github.com/Wind4/vlmcsd). you can selfhost it, choose any windows version like 11 pro or enterprise or office product like office 24 enterprise. activate it using your kms server and you can enter the matching licence key every so often to activate it. doesn't cost a cent except hosting on 512mb/1cpu. i think there are public kms servers with vlmcsd too. obviously JUST FOR TESTING PURPOSES ;)

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    ipv6 is great for public networks/ wan or extreme large nets. but for a small local net, ipv4 is so much easier if you need to access a single device. if ipv6 is parallell too, great but I hope ipv4 wont be disabled/ non existens in the future bc of this

  • source
  • view more: next ›