A lot of attention has been paid to the mischief done by “agentic” large language models (LLMs) on their own initiative. But the more immediate and commonplace danger is that AI will multiply and indulge existing human weaknesses. AI does not have to be super intelligent to provide an excuse for secretive and poor-quality government decision-making.

[–] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

The ban prompted backlash, including from the state government, due to concerns about how it might affect Australia's biggest cycling event, the Tour Down Under (TDU), whose main sponsor is gas giant Santos.

Sounds like the ban was killed for fear of it actually having an impact.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago

    Great line from David Pocock

    "It's disappointing to see the reviewers adopt the disingenuous language of the big AI companies talking about 'misaligned behaviour' and failing to apportion clear accountability," he said.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    Isn't a database only as global as you make it? The connection is surely a real object that needs to be passed around and referenced just like any other.

    I don't really touch JavaScript or web dev so I might be misunderstanding the domain usage.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 child)

    Not Adelaide Council, in case anyone else read the headline that way, but Playford.

    I hope one day the understanding filters down the to the general public that adding more lanes to major roads increases congestion instead of alleviating it.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 days ago

    It is! Open Source is about more than the source being viewable, it's about ensuring the rights of the user to view, use, modify and redistribute software without impediment. Because this licence puts restrictions on redistribution, it's not an Open Source licence.

    Here is the full Open Source Definition.

    The four freedoms relate to the heavily overlapping concept of Free Software.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    For those in need, the article links to the Antipoverty Centre's ‘Mutual’ Obligations Survival Guide

    The penalties were suspended more than two years ago, with two subsequent reports by the Commonwealth Ombudsman exposing unlawful cancellations and failings in the government’s approach to compensating affected people.

    In August 2025, Commonwealth Ombudsman Iain Anderson recommended the government establish a compensation scheme.

    A second report in December 2025 found the department’s remediation approach was unfair and unreasonable, warning that stigma against job seekers may also contribute to inadequate oversight of employment service providers.

     

    The submission, authored by co-chairs, El Gibbs and Dougie Herd, added the savings could be achieved through focusing on provider integrity, fraud enforcement and pricing reform – rather than cutting support services for Australians with disabilities.

    “The community has, repeatedly, asked for that change to be done with us, not to us. The community has not been listened to in the design of this bill,” it said.

    “The bill in its current form does material harm to current and future participants. It misrepresents the founding intentions of the NDIS. It inverts the [2023 NDIS] review on which the government relies. It demolishes the federated joint venture and concentrates unprecedented power in the Commonwealth minister.

    “It is, on the government’s own admission, retrogressive against the rights framework the NDIS Act exists to give effect to. And it has been progressed under a timetable that breaches Australia’s binding obligation to consult.”

    The committee was established in 2025 to advise the federal NDIS minister and state and territory disability ministers about the real-world impacts of any changes to the scheme.

     

    Hi all,

    I'm looking for a video I lost track of.

    The video is fully narrated, the visuals are animated but only support the narration. The author describes their journey in the creative arts, as they graduated from a creative arts degree and attempted to find a job. They quickly found themselves locked out of the industry, being unable to find a job immediately, and being unable to either work independently or to polish their skills as they were unable to afford the software they needed, chiefly Autodesk Maya. They saved up for the software but by the time they had enough money it had transitioned to a subscription plan which was drastically more expensive.

    The video went into depth on the economics of the subscriptions Autodesk offered, and the history of Autodesk and how it acquires and degrades software. It talked in depth about the state of software and subscriptions across the industry.

    The animation consisted of an anthropomorphic cat as the author's self-insert, and alternated between showing real world things (like living in a small apartment with mostly just a computer) and visuals representing the feelings of the author throughout their experiences, like feeling small, or being caged or possibly being crushed. When necessary for communication the video showed web pages, both from the internet archive and present day to verify it's points on history, marketing and subscription fees.

    The video was long form, likely 1-2 hours in length.

    I've had no luck searching for it through google or youtube with any of the keywords autodesk, maya, cat, animation, subscription etc.

    Even if you remember a word from the title or any details that can help me search that would be awesome.

    view more: next ›