I have. You all seem to think only cheaters play with mods, for a game that's against NPC's which gives zero advantage to playing with them. You all just don't mind eating arrowheads boot if it doesn't affect you :).

You don't play the game do you? It's versus NPC's. There are no other players to shoot by getting rid of the grass.

Like I said, there's been far better solutions offered that allow the best of worlds by smarter people, which certainly isn't you

Then you should read their actual post since they're actually happy with some of the mods that have come out, and I do truly hope that the ones that are good for the community are not banned.

I don't have faith that using EAC will achieve that, and also believe other solutions are available. Oh well though, killing off a community inside your online game is always a great idea right?

That is not at all what I said. They could provide lobbies for modded only clients, and those with no mods. Boom, both parties happy. Modders can continue to have such QoL stuff, cosmetics, and what ever else they may like. No bother to you at all.

That's also only one solution that doesn't resort to needing to ban them and use an entirely different anti cheat client.

Ban the cheaters getting SC easily, or ruining other players game. I just highly doubt that's a high % of the moding community.

It's a game against entities, who, the fuck, cares? If you don't like the players in your match you can just find a new one.

If there's a mod that gives you control over the host and prevents you from kicking them? Yeah alright, that's totally understandable, and wanting to fix that should be a goal.

They probably don't need to use EAC to achieve that though. Many better solutions have been suggested.

It's not gamerbaby rage to be angry that Hd2 banned QoL mods and optimizations all cause they can't fix their own shit.

Except they don't... because whether you block a human or a robot, you'll be arrested. Just like the article says.

This lady is arguing that robots should not have that right. So comparing it to a wheelchair bound person is not an acceptable comparison. It should be between other robots, and what rights they should be given, considering that is what is being discussed

Go read the very bottom, all of it, where it explicitly says how the bird itself chooses to enter the capsule, repeatedly, and even chose the site for diving.

I know this is a very sore subject for many, especially for someone calling pets a slave, but the bird absolutely did choose and seemingly had fun.

We can't know what animals feel, or what's truly going on in their head. We can study their reactions, but what if that reaction shows they're happy? Would you still accept that?

Thank you!! Yes that was definitely it, and it broke my shortcuts too which was the only reason I know.

Kinda feel bad getting it wrong, but man, fuck that guy who tried saying it's "not even possible" when clearly something similar happened lol. Thank you again

You should probably read the article then, since a bird did volunteer to do this

Sure, if the student intended to harm the cop, and slipped it directly under his foot when he went to step. That would be a fair equivalent, and I would say yeah, the student is in the wrong.

You can't throw something intended to harm others, and then cry fowl. The cop is the reason that students hand is gone. No clue why you would say otherwise, except tovictim blame.