-
Heaven is where the police are British
-
...why would police be allowed into heaven?
-
It feels like an easy upvote as an American, but…there are countries where police are dutiful, helpful, and measured in force.
...
It's a thread about British police...
But while we're here, none of your examples fit the description either.
Where? In Madeupland? The United Kingdom of Doesn't Exist and Northern Imagination?
Our police may not be as bad as American police but they're certainly not dutiful, helpful, or measured in force.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institutional_racism_in_the_Metropolitan_Police
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_killings_by_law_enforcement_officers_in_the_United_Kingdom
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoot-to-kill_policy_in_Northern_Ireland
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_undercover_policing_scandal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Custodial_deaths_in_the_United_Kingdom
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_corruption#United_Kingdom
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_enforcement_in_the_United_Kingdom#Issues
I've been using linus for like 27 years or so
New honeypot just dropped?!
Nvidia announcing AI CEO when?
No risk of honeypotting when the CEO ain't got the need to lust. And it would solidify that their money is where their mouth is in terms of confidence in AI being "super intelligent" (and hopefully result in their downfall, but shh...)
Twat McTwatty calls for replacement of Prime Ministers with Presidents.
He talks about democracy but really wants to centralise power. The very opposite of democracy. What a snake.
An enzyme (a protein that speeds up chemical reactions) that breaks down polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic works ten times quicker, using 10 times using less enzyme just by changing the liquid it works in and making small changes to the enzyme's structure.
I never thought I'd be glad to see lack of proof reading, but in the age of LLMs at least it demonstrates likely human authorship.
For reference, what I think remon is talking about:
*wizodum
They're published by the house of commons because they're written by an official committee.
That does not mean parliament agrees or endorses their findings. It's written with that headline to lend additional authority and credence to the reports that does not exist.
So yes, you're right, you're spreading disinformation instead of misinformation.
A committee is not parliament. This is misinformation.
Not sure if a poor attempt at trolling by copying this onion piece or just a fool...
Mans doesn't even get sworn into office until January.
He sounds delightful...
In May 2019, the Court of Appeal adopted his own terminology, describing one of Jay's own judgments as being hardly "pellucid". As well as levelling this mocking criticism at his legal writing, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal on every ground raised, including the ground that Jay had been so overbearing, rude, and bullying to the claimant (whose first language was not English but Polish, and who was acting without legal help), that the trial had been unfair.[10][11] In June 2020, the UK Supreme Court went further and found that Jay had "harassed and intimidated [the claimant] in ways which surely would never have occurred if the claimant had been represented".[12]
Ironically, the article is about intellectual property and op doesn't care, it seems.
It's about a change from copyright to copyleft.
Copyleft:
In this sense, freedoms refers to the use of the work for any purpose, and the ability to modify, copy, share, and redistribute the work, with or without a fee.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft
There is no irony.
The UK has no leg to stand on lecturing other countries about unjust arrests and prosecutions when it's arresting hundreds of grannies standing with cardboard signs as terrorists.
Australia, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States also signed onto the statement, condemning how Hong Kong's National Security Law "is being used to target individuals for political expression and participation."
Pot, meet kettle.
I was listening to Shostakovich's String Quartet 8 when I opened this and the climax started just as the film started proper with the lil red guy and lasted until the end of the film.
Would recommend watching them together
5:38 for the start of the climax
Regulate them into oblivion.
They provide no public good and have a list of down sides.
That abundance should be used to reduce our reliance on fossil fuel energy and decarbonise. Instead with every Watt gained it's being assigned to a new, unnecessary, purpose.
We should be seeing our energy bills drastically reduce, and they're not.
This documentary by activist and writer Peter Gelderloos explains why using our additional energy production on new projects instead of current projects is detrimental to society and the climate quite well.
https://kolektiva.media/w/iY2SJKKXcUkBMPPxXngAGT
As for the empty space argument:
We should be increasing biodiversity to tackle the man made desert that is the Highlands, not tarring it over to create wealth for a handful of capitalist billionaires.
view more:
next ›