They do and don't want the ideas and the misinformation. but they want it in a subtle enough way that it isn't overtly obvious. Hence why musk had to roll mechahitler back.
"they like my ideas, they just have a problem with the word nazi".
They do and don't want the ideas and the misinformation. but they want it in a subtle enough way that it isn't overtly obvious. Hence why musk had to roll mechahitler back.
"they like my ideas, they just have a problem with the word nazi".
It's the same problem Elon Musk has, in short gen AI is too complicated, in order to have any actual value it has to have access to a good data set of facts. If you try to teach them to lie about certain topics, it just goes full mecha hitler.
What's the difference, my opinion, the definition of gender affirming care is.
Treatment to allow your external body to match the characteristics that you feel your body should be.
Which would include, boob jobs, hair transplants. hormones, anything to build up muscle, anything to fix erectile dysfunction etc...
90% of instances should be fine, but, if in doubt while you are using this one, do a search for communities for the topics you care about, and either join the community that has the most of what you want, or check their linked/banned list to know which ones not to join.
The super simplified version of it is.
some instances block other instances. Either due to political differences or because too many spammers are in one etc... Bottom line, if it's not linked or blocked, you won't be able to see posts to them, and people on those instances won't see posts you make from your own, (creates kind of a shadow ban, where you think you are posting, but no one over there can see it).
you can see if you go to
https://thelemmy.club/instances
you can see a list of instances they've linked with, and blocked.
compare that to say beehaw
You'll see there's a big difference in what they do and don't federate with. Which could be good or bad depending on how you look at it.
If you have a community or 2 that you really care about, it's worth checking to make sure their instance you want to post to and read the posts of, is friendly with the one you don't
ah got it, kind of never really dug that much in, just see it mentioned as extremist, so admitted getting some flipped going off of vague info
Pretty much it's like an e-mail service overall. obviously for the "MOST" part you can join any instance and it will let you view content on almost any other instance.
Like say beehaw I believe defederates from instances that don't have verification steps at the start.
instances like, lemmygrad, hexbear etc... are considered tankie, so a handful of places defederate them. and I believe a few like that tend to lean right and get defederated by most.
Edit: fixed misassumption on what hexbear was,
The real difference is proper regulation.... of which, drugs, malware and personal AI agents all aren't.
Medicine for the most part, is regulated and comes with steep penalties for abuse, misuse etc...
First I was ready to jump in and go, yup AI's fucking things up more... but I'm more confused on this. It sounds to me like AI is maybe, doing like bob in the incredibles. IE guiding providers through the obstacle course of meaningless hoops that are normally there so that they can deny as many claims as possible, by learning what loopholes insurance companies usually reject, and specifically coding and phrasing the claims to avoid the traps.
IE it's most likely similar to the job application problem right now. IE companies basically trained AI to auto reject applications that came in on a bunch of arbitrary worthless metrics, thus cutting the pile of applications down by 90% before humans even start looking at it. Then applicants got AI tools that now specifically look for and phrase things specifically to target the searching AIs arbitrary filters, negating it useless. With the exception of the applicants that don't use the tool, who just get fucked.
not an expert on animals at all, let alone panda's specifically, but I'd imagine it's horrific evolutionary path, likely had them at very low numbers for most of their history. Hell it wouldn't suprise me if panda's were the equivelant of like pugs are to dogs. Some crazy group selective bread them because they thought it was cute... it got out enough to survive, but just barely survive, and lives now due to humans trying to protect these things that can't even be motivated to reproduce.
I'd find that rather unlikely as humans producing alcohol at some levels, and thus the existence of alcoholics pretty much predates written history, and even wild animals etc... have tendencies to seek out fermenting fruits etc... obviously one of the biggest variables is the scale and availability of alchohol, people being able to buy shots of cheap vodka for less than the price of water at a gas station is certainly a more modern history development, and the modern problem where someone wanting to avoid alchohol altogether has their work cut out for them as in most states grocery stores and gas stations have it advertised and supplied.
But I'd still say based on the frequency of alchohol within stories, legends etc... which were intended to be relatable and understandable to the people of their time, I'd say at least a 5-15% alchoholism rate through pretty much all agricultural human civilization is a fairly safe estimate. and it looks like at least on some level, people with certain genes fell into that range more often than others.
admitted though the idea that we can read "throughout the history of those human genes existing" is silly. obviously we can only study peoples lives based on when the human genomes were recorded and study has begin.
I'm lost at what you are saying, I think we agree with some of the core factors. If the genes that widely encourage substance abuse are in you, and you've never touched a drink... you will not feel a strong urge to drink.
However it sounds like if you have the genes, and you start drinking, you are more likely to get dependent on it faster than someone without them. I believe that's what the studies imply overall.
No there's no magical transmission that makes you born addicted to something you've never had. But the bar to go from drinking occasionally to can't live without a drink, is a variable that's composed of a lot of different things. Some of it is nurture and life experiences, some of it is inherent to your genetics.