I mean it's a problem in the marketing and common usage of LLMs. That's exactly it though, LLM companies, and people are describing LLMs as a way to do research.

IE you could say these criticisms come in things like wikipedia too. IE anyone can write what they want, but what does wikipedia require? right every single claim has to be cited. So if you go to wikipedia find misinformation, you click on the number and see it.

If you ask chatgpt What diseases should I be concerned about in africa, it lists you a few. You can then... google it, find the wikipedia page, and look for what's there. It's a tool without a purpose at that point. because it literally doesn't save you any steps. It doesn't guide you to the source to check it's facts, when it tells you them it may or may not be making up the sources. At which point, it has no factual use, or use in even directing to the facts.

No one is surprised when the dog gets worms after eating poop it found in the yard. Why are we shocked that an AI that doesn’t know fact from fiction treats everything the same?

I think that's the problem though, I think the poop in the yard is a better example. Key is the researchers put that information in speculation. That's like if Anderson Cooper made up a fake news story, and posted it in an anonymous tweet to analyze how far it would spread, and then fox news picks it up and runs with the story all day.

That's the key problem, people are trusting LLMs to do their research for them, when LLMs just gather all the information they can get their hands on mindlessly.

That's the key problem, If they send a misinformative article, to a place for untested, unproven random speculation with a very low bar for who can submit... they can determine that LLMs are looking there. Key thing to note is, it's not their fake disease that's the threat. It's that if it found their fake article, then LLMs probably also scooped up a ton of other misinformed or dubious things.

Lets look at it this way, say it was a cake, but we threw it in the garbage, 2 weeks later we find the same cake... at jims bakery, same ID, same distinct marker we put on it.

What does that tell us, it tells us that Jims bakery is clearly sometimes, dumpster diving and putting things up that clearly are dangerous.

and out, that's really the key problem, we don't know shit about it, because literally propoganda is all we have. China at least we have some level of communication and shared dialog between regular american citizens and regular american chinese citizens.

I mean peer tube and similar exist. I think the majority of channels with over a 25k views, I don't think there's a consistant number anyone gets, but something like 100 bucks per 25k views or so is pretty common.

Biggest thing that I think is pretty badly phrased... is linux "system requirements". considering in the windows world if you try and install with less than the required ram... the installer will usually stop you.

While in ubuntu they may say "requirement" but it's a recomendation. You can install 26 into a VM with 1 GB of ram... and it will run. Really nothing in this version of ubuntu is more resource hungry than the previous version. So in short them boosting the number is just saying "if you use a typical amount of tabs open in your browser, 6gb ram is kind of needed".

So yeah I'd say most likely the fair way to put it is, windows 11 will let you install on 4gb of ram... but most would say it's very unusable even at a basic level with that, you can run ubuntu with that... it will probably not be a great experience, but not as bad as windows until you start running into large web apps or tons of tabs.

Heck OS's really could just have an "overhead" kind of number or something. Because that's the real thing, what you need is system specs that can handle your

system kernel + system services > Interface (be it terminal or gui) > application (and if that application is loading external sources like web pages, add that in too).

Point is your "minimum" line, should stop at what you consider the default parts of your distribution. IE interface and below.

Obviously no one is using it without applciations, but we don't know what applications people are using. It's not like we do this for storage. IE we aren't saying "ok yeah everything we included is within 5 GB, so we're setting the requirement at 200 TB because you can't be a video editor without that much space.

You know, that would actually be the funniest possible concept if it actually turned out to be true. We discover the whole wild kingdom is like pulling a toy story on us. All animals are sentient, Our dogs actually speak perfect english.

It's much like HHGTTG said about dolphins.

“For instance, on the planet Earth, man had always assumed that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had achieved so much—the wheel, New York, wars and so on—whilst all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always believed that they were far more intelligent than man—for precisely the same reasons.”

A bit of a rough one, but I'd say it's passed the point of concern. IE I tend to view it in life stages. 25-46 is IMO a lot less creepy than say, 20 dating 30. In spite of the gap being halved. Graduating college is a big step, getting started in a career.

Once you are in a career path, life doesn't really change all that much. age differences don't matter so much anymore provided both are past all the big shifts.

I mean it's a mixed bag.. I get the idea of nothing should be removed, blocked, downvoted etc... as the ideal of free speach.

Right up until you look at every platform that explicitly avoids it and goes full "We're all about free speech!".

IE huge problem is, the first people to jump to those platforms, are the ones that have been banned for good reason from everywhere else. Which of course means... nazi's come in droves Reasonable people that either have less borderline, or perhaps no borderline thoughts get there... see 500 posts from nazi's, and head for the door imidiately, until it just turns into a nazi echo chamber.

I mean in rational views... the police and DOJ can't be trusted, the story still has a lot of oddities in it, the text messages seem staged as hell, whether that being Robinson going out of his way to actively clear his roomate, or the police just forging messages.

That being said I haven't seen anything that seems to contradict the idea that Robinson himself, was opposed to Kirk's hate mongering, and took the shot for that reason.

I mean, I'm not going to pretend to know everything, obviously a lot of it is media coverage etc... not enough is known, and hell there's the weird oddities that make me question the entire robinson narrative. (IE the assemble/dissassemble the rifle multiple times that don't make sense, the fact that the supposed exit wound looks more like an entry wound etc...), But assuming robinson is the shooter, with what we can see, it seems more likely he was against kirks hatred rather than feeling it didn't go far enough.

I will admit there's not enough to go on to get a picture, but with everything that is there, I don't really see anything there that points to robinson being a bigot.

I mean his death couldn't have been more memable. He literally got shot at a school by a white kid. While talking about school shootings, trying to shift the focus onto black gangs, standing under a prove me wrong tent.

Fairly not super experienced on things. but how viable is a layered system, does it just prohibitively slow or storage consuming or is it moderately feasible to say double encapsulate everything.