I mean what about ww2? All terrible disasters, but the concept was "chernobyl was not small made bigger by capitalism for fearmongering, it was huge all along". Then we can also discuss how terrible and how many victims capitalism brought, just don't base it on a lie or you'll just loose the trust of other people. Whataboutism doesn't help either, you are deflecting when you already have a lot of other potential arguments. Be better.

Isn't that his own hand putting that "jacket" aside to let her feel his abs?

Just to name one that would basically... impact all: cell towers use gps for timing. You would basically loose cell service

I totally agree. Unfortunately my country doesn't really have real publishers anymore. They only publish books from politicians, actors or books from other countries. They pretend to make an effort with small competitions but they only publish short stories and generally you can trace the winners to famous people anyway...

If you try to publish there will only be fake publishers that want your money. Literature is basically dead. I'm not a disillusioned writer by the way, but I know one (i can'twrite shit so I know how hard it is to actually write a book). It's so sad.

At least developing is not going away because companies will always need some software and sw created via vibe coding sucks so hard it makes me laugh when people think it's somewhat usable.

Lol, only a crazy country would allow that

That's kinda fallacious as an argument. AI cannot create good code, it CAN be used to create code, but requires.expert to fix the tons of mistakes and simply bad coding solutions it comes up with. If you don't have the skills it's better to use a tool made to help you with that with its limitations (rpg maker in your example) rather than use a tool made to aid already expert users (that even they say it actually creates more work for them lol). I write code myself and LLMs simply suck at coding. They can create "art" but it's all the same and you can spot it on their steam page when they do. Honestly, I'm not even angry at them for thinking the same way as you do: it's just that those coding solutions are advertised as such, and people are simply ignoring the expert in the field that tell them they can't actually do that. If you try that road you will either create something that doesn't work or something that will put its users at risk (by creating trojan backdoors in theor system or sharing sensitive information) and that's something I can't simply condone.

I mean, top of the line is an overstatement. It's the quantities and the supply chain behind it that make it worth it, from a technological point of view they are good at best.

Unless you are in japan