Cool!
I'm surprised it is all women! Is this a complete list? I can understand why transwomen would be more motivated to get involved in politics, but its still surprising to me that its 100% women.
Model welfare folks going nuts with excitement right now
There's nothing wrong with having quiet-hours laws and enforcing them. The problem is when the criticism is framed in terms of groups by ethnic or national identity. Either the violations should be enforced, as with any other rule/law, or perhaps there could be some kind of policy change. All of that is worth talking about. My objection is to the idea that its appropriate to frame the problem in essentializing and racialized language. Suppose I have a dispute with my Jewish neighbor. He loves to grill his kosher meat every Saturday with his family. I don't like the smell. Here is one way to frame this dispute: "My neighbor has a custom of grilling meat on Saturdays, but I don't like it because the smell wafts into my house and I'm vegan." Here is another "My JEW neighbor grills his JEW meat every Saturday because Jewish culture is just murderous and doesn't care about animals like I and my culture do. He is such a piece of shit asshole, just like all of THOSE people."
Which one sounds like a fair way to frame a discussion about a conflict between two people? Now obviously your initial comment didn't say anything overtly racist like in my example, which is very extreme. But you framed it as a conflict between some anomalous THEM and the 'local' culture, a.k.a., US. The problem is subtler, but its the same problem.
"...there is living amongst us a non-German, foreign race, unwilling and unable to sacrifice its racial characteristics, to deny its feeling, thinking and striving, and which none the less possesses all the political rights that we ourselves have."
It's an odd hypothetical which posits the existence of a group that took the same role that the Jews did for Hitler - unable to assimilate because of cultural incompatibility, lack of loyalty to their nation-state, and this being true as a result of a self-isolation of the members of that community.
Or perhaps its a cheap shot to appeal to literal Nazis. How about the contemporary far-right?
"The Islamic culture is inferior to our Western culture... Mass immigration from Islamic countries means more crime, more terror, more anti-Semitism, and less freedom and democracy. Integration is impossible because Islam is not just a religion, but a totalitarian political ideology."
It's almost as if framing the problem as "the minority has big issues integrating" is in itself a kind of dogwhistle, a poisoning the well toward a racist explanation and therefore racist solution.
Thanks all for your thoughts. Super helpful! I'm going to give some thought to things I can contribute to smaller communities given my offline interests.
I don't know how much this generalizes but I know that at the Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, the doors were made large enough for Emperors and then Sultans to be able to enter the building with their horses and carriage.
My understanding is that they can just take the funds from your bank account or garnish from your paycheck (whether Israeli or Palestinian because the Palestinian Authority cooperates with Israel).
“I must say that I consider the phrase ‘tax the rich’ – quote tax the rich – spit out with anger and contempt by politicians both here and across the country, to be just as hateful as some disgusting racial slurs, and even the phrase from the ‘river to the sea’,” he said, referring to the controversial pro-Palestinian slogan.
A LOT to unpack here.
That's interesting, as that would be the arrow I feel most confidently about. EA grew pretty explicitly out of Singer's Giving Pledge and Giving What We Can book, and Will MacAskill's (his student) networking with finance and tech bros. (That isn't to say the tech bros weren't just exploiting the idea for their own benefit.)
The rest of the arrows, I agree, it seems plausible to me but I have no hard evidence
I'm an idiot. Thank you!