[–] 10 points 3 months ago (8 children)

I believe a lot of these people had the right idea at the right time but are by no means a good judge for these kinds of things. And should not in the least bit believe everything they touch turns to gold. You were FaceBook, you did good once. Enjoy your money and just stop.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Red Dead 2 for me.

    I constantly get everything wrong. Never understand the quests or what I'm supposed to do, always making the wrong decisions. Constantly having to retry.

    It felt like it was designed by aliens that just read a few books on life on earth and cowboys and made an open world game.

    "Hurry you have to do this one thing RIGHT NOW" means you can do that thing whenever you want. Hell. You can even take and 8 year old on a fishing trip but I get tricked into losing sleep on a workday because of appearant lies.. I never knew when I was in a quest or not.

    BG3 I straight up refunded because it reminded me why I hated D&D. I just end up save scumming and hating melee combat against ranged targets. I walk 2 steps towards the enemy the enemy also walks two steps and throws a dagger in my face. Repeat. To be fair I hated XCOM for the same reason. I loved Fallout 1 and 2 though.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    The arguments are all over the place but in quick. You can't resell digital games. Also PC is an open platform, Xbox and Playstation are not. Steam might feel like a monopoly but they have to keep in mind the competitors like Epic and can't rip you off too much.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

    Having a 21 year old Steam account and having bought quite some games makes it hard to stay subjective about this for me. I don't disagree with you but I see Valve as the best monopoly if I could choose. And I don't see Epic performing the same services while tryharding tremendously to be the monoply themselves by giving away free games.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Hello guys,

    We're somewhat struggling with moving traditional file shares to SharePoint Online. Unanimously people recommend moving to multiple sites vs a single one because the ease of management. While I do not doubt that I simply cannot see the logic. The only real limitation I can think of is the amount of items per site where moving to multiple sites would make a difference.

    What is easier about managing permissions on for example 5 folders in the root of a single site vs managing the permissions on 5 separate sites?

    What I do know is that it is way easier to have my user go to a single site to find their stuff vs 5 different sites (and their corresponding URL's) or am I missing something here?

     

    For a few years I'm noticing more and more weird and unexplainable behaviour in Outlook. We support mostly 365 Exchange Online clients on Windows workstations or RDS environments.

    The amounts of unexplainable bullshit we face is staggering. Outlook not being able to open the folder set, weird MFA glitches, weird bugs in the UI and downright weird errors coming from nowhere is some of the stuff we face weekly.

    Am I alone on this?

     

    I want to make a playlist with some livesets, these are usually an hour. I have added these into a playlist and I cannot for the life of me stop YouTube from continuing halfway where I once stopped some of them.

    Starting from the beginning and letting it play for 10 seconds, pressing on the timeline at the start a few times. Nothing works.

    At this point disabling the option of automatic saving / continuing is fine but I can't find and options whatsoever.

    Am I dumb or is YouTube just stupid?

    view more: next ›