[–] 3 points 4 months ago*

Ik heb wel interesse maar ik vind het maar moeiliijk nieuws te vinden tegenwoordig. Ze bieden geen rss-feed aan, zitten achter een betaalmuur en wat er overblijft zijn roddels, sport en slecht geschreven korte stukjes.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, "scanning errors", like when it's charging me full price instead of the discount that it was supposed to be on, which would not be as obvious if a cashier scanned it?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    ultimatum: build device-level scanning to detect “illegal images” or we’ll pass laws to force your hand.

    As if Google and Apple wouldn't be more than happy to do this, if they aren't already.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Seems similar to Instagram. They want you to add them because more followers makes them appear more popular. Snapchat I've never used but it's kind of known to be popular with pedos and thus pedo hunters, who probably write you.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Yeah I suppose those boutique shops are more for rich people but there's shops with cheap stuff too, often kind of hidden and unwelcoming. I used to live across from one for a while before I even realized it was a shop, and it was still open. Just saw the guy closing up but never saw a customer. I had a look out of curiosity and it was just some old guy selling bottles of washing liquid and everything was covered in a layer of dust like it hadn't been touched in years. He looked happy to see a customer so I felt sorry for him to just walk out again.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    I'll grab some beers from the minimarkt at most. Everything else comes from the supermarket. And I often pass those tiny stores that never seem to have any customers – e.g. a shop just for socks? – and I always wonder how they can exist. There must be some kind of tax breaks or tax evasion going on.

  • source
  • view more: next ›