[–] 33 points 1 week ago* (6 children)

Unfortunately the majority of deputies and senators are from Bolsonaro's party. Lula's win was a huge victory, but we still have a lot to fight for here in Brazil.

The good thing is that Lula's party learned how to comunicate through social media, this helped him TREMENDOUSLY in his victory.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago

    lmao, this is the funniest title I've read this month.

    But on a serious note: there's a strong propaganda pushed by people in power that only criminals need privacy, because "if you have something to hide, you must be doing something wrong".

    Expanding on this thought, there's also a stereotype that only socially akward and creepy people (mostly guys) worry about privacy, because "eeeeww, why can't you just be normal? Nobody cares about privacy" (yes, I've heard women say that to me. Most of them are chill tho).

    Now to counter argue the first point I made: the true motivation to push this propaganda is to have more access to people's information and consequently more money and power.

    The irony is that a lot of those who say they "have nothing to hide" would tremble in fear if their spouses read their chat messages or saw where they are spending their money.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 child)

    Your point?

    Lower product quality. It's visible that the game is using the same generic assets, characters and voices that many AI generated games are using. I can't say they are buggy because I don't buy the games since they never appeal to me.

    People are still free to generate and purchase AI games if they want, but the quality looks bad to me.

    What is the cut off for human gruntwork to make it good and not badwrongfun?

    As long as it doesn't feel generic and poorly developed, which can be AI and non-AI generated games. Doesn't have anything to do with elitism.

    By the way, your initial comment talks about "elitist pricks who don’t know how to code and refuse to use tools to help". In my previous comment I was trying to differentiate between professionals using AI to assist them and people generating almost an entire game with AI with no thought behind it, which produces the low-quality products I mentioned.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

    É, faz mais sentido utilizarem uma fila mesmo. Não entendi porque alguém sugeriu exportar o histórico do reddit como forma de protesto, pode ser que isso nem tenha surtido efeito.

    Sua explicação é muito boa, achei até que você fosse um professor universitário kkkkkkk. Muito obrigado.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 month ago*

    Não só as empresas de bet quanto os influencers e times de futebol que estavam lucrando com isso.

    Eles estão postando em instagram, twitter, tiktok, etc; reclamando que o governo foi muito apressado com essa medida, que não houve diálogo e pipipi.

    Eu quero é que todos eles se lasquem.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Proibir vai obscurescer o problema pro mercado negro.

    O quão grande será o mercado negro quando comparado ao mercado que estava em vigor? Não acredito que chegará nem perto do estrago que foi causado.

    Faz mais sentido usar esse esforço em educação e apoio psicológico.

    Por que não combinar isso com a proibição? Dessa forma você só precisa tratar os que restaram no mercado negro, e não todos que foram influenciados pelos anúncios de bet em ônibus, televisão, live de internet, jogos de futebol, perfis de influencers no instagram, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›