[–] 2 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

As far as I know, none. "Smart" in smart TVs means ads, data collection and profit, they aren't about to leave money on the table.

The only way to get "dumb" TVs is to purchase digital signage TVs meant for in-store displays and other business use. In fact, they're better than ordinary TVs with improved cooling and rated lifespans, specially designed to run 24 hours a day in a cafe or smth.

Unfortunately, companies don't sell it to individuals, you have to buy it as a company. You either have to buy used or set up your own shell company. I'm this close to setting up a fake company to buy a TV, but I'm not sure if it'll work. Hopefully there's no secret legally binding TOS or smth.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    As long as as humans haven't succumed to brainrot and still have capacity for math and logic, we can figure it out. It's encoded, not encrypted.

    The classic problem of long-term nuclear waste warning messages is about conveying information over cultural barriers. This is a concrete data type, not interpretation of vague contexual meanings from pictograms. Math and logic don't change while cultures do. Images are far more retrievable than the meaning of an image.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    I don't agree with porn as an example. It clearly isn't a social activity.

    Alcohol on the other hand.. Haven't you heard that Gen z and younger have much lower rates of drinking? Social drinking is on the decline, and I argue it supports my theory. Their friends aren't drinking socially as much, so many don't either.

    I don't think VPN are going to help much. Good VPNs are paid services, and it's kids under 18 we're talking about here. They would somehow need to maintain a recurring VPN subscription fee from their pocket money. Free VPNs aren't the same thing, they're usually exposed to steal data or other nefarious activities.

    Platforms like discord and roblox aren't blocked because they're considered communication apps or games. Kids will probably just stay there.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago* (8 children)

    I fully believe it will work. The point is not to make it impossible to visit, but very annoying to. I cannot forsee the average kid jumping through hoops to maintain access, especially when most of their and their friends accounts were deleted. Eventually, they'll realise there's nothing left to go back to. Social media lives and dies by it's number of users after all.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›