[–] -1 points 10 months ago

People here up upvoting baseless conspiracies based on a braindead notice that technology is like magic.

If everything was tracked and harvested by Brave, it'd destroy them much more than the bullshit "homophobe" allegation. Just use network traffic monitors to see if it does. You think people haven't tried?

Or do you think software can covertly send data without users being able to determine?

It's open source for fucks sake. Stop with the Alex Jones tier analysis.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    The report was made a couple months before the 2020 election. Many others also made wild reports. I saw two others in the Epstein files made literally 6 days for the election.

    There are plenty of reasons to make up a story.

    But sure, they should go and investigate it. Starting with the woman and her uncle. Oh wait, I bet the uncle is dead. And I bet she took great effort to gather evidence... right...?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [+] -11 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    This happened before he met Ghislaine and well before all documented abuse victims.

    Nothing seems credible. They waited almost 40 years, right before the 2020 election, to say something. And take no efforts to gather corroborating evidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    That's not true. You need credible evidence that something illegal happened. An uncorroborated report almost 40 years after the incident, made just weeks before the 2020 election is not credible or useful for prosecution.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago*

    Happens all the time in the legal field. I once got a document in discovery that inverted the proper redactions. It was a roster of identifying information, all unredacted except for the actual relevant person in the case — that was redacted. 🤣

    Redacting with black boxes over text is more common of a mistake than that.

  • source
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›