No, not necessarily. Eisenkot now gets to try and form a majority coalition, which will almost certainly require breaking election promises. If he doesn't succeed, Netanyahu gets to try next.
Regular Tuesday in France
Both wings were still attached, it's just very poorly visible here. There are slightly sharper stills out there that more clearly show both are present at this point.
Valve would have to wade into the legal quagmire that is "determining whether a product has been AI generated, and to what degree". No way in hell they're touching that.
Give it some years and it might.
Race conditions I'm pretty sure aren't language specific. Rust can have them too.
This was caught during review, so nothing was "introduced" quite yet. And there's no indication that Linus wouldn't have produced a race condition (a notoriously more easy to miss kind of bug) without the use of AI tools.
It's only being exaggerated so much because he used AI.
It's called the Kehlsteinhaus, and it housed a permanent exhibition of Nazi crimes.
In case you weren't aware, " is also the symbol for 'seconds'.
Criminals don't own datacenters running the models that actually pose a threat.
Official source this is based on is https://www.ncsc.nl/en/alerts/update-php-vulnerabilities-remain-a-reason-for-immediate-patching, which mentions they're investigating signs of exploits and that they have at least one confirmed exploit that happened abroad.
It's still a complex exploit, mind, but not an unusable one.
You say that as if "below average" looking people can't be physically attractive to someone, and as if people universally agree on an attractiveness ranking rather than having personal tastes.
It's usually not the looks being average why those guys have trouble.
I mean, the national cybersecurity council here saw exploits happening in the wild. So it's definitely possible and practical enough for it to happen.
N64 has historically been one of the more complicated consoles to emulate. Being old is no indicator for complexity. The latest xbox for example internally is much more like a generic pc than the PS3 was (also a complex one to emulate).
At the architectural level, there's definitely a difference yes. But at the smaller scoped implementation level the latest models are pretty good compared to humans. Not perfect by any means, sure, but it's not all drivel anymore. It was 2 years ago, but today's definitely different.
Race conditions are generally harder to catch, even for human devs. And you're saying it as if Linus wouldn't have introduced it had he coded everything by hand, which I don't think is remotely guaranteed (like he never makes mistakes). And the review system clearly works just fine still.
Good developers can accelerate their work with agents, and you're right that you can generate tons of LLM-powered slop with it too. But that's why dismissing anything an agent wrote immediately is also wrong. The review determines if it's good enough, whether a human or an agent wrote it.
Sure, that's why I said "not necessarily". LLMs can be misused and made to do dumb shit too. But I have seen plenty of bullshit come from human developers too.
Verifying LLM code isn't necessarily harder than verifying a human PR. I hope that this also boosts automated test tooling so that it also gets easier to test these PRs, since the focus will shift to review rather than writing.
As is commonly known, in France they brand the word "immigrant" on the forehead of immigrants for easy identification.
Overdrive is not even a decompilation project lmao, it was DMCAd because it offers a way to bypass DRM on games.
view more:
next βΊ