Exactly; the OP image is saying that there's no point to doing that.

Both GitHub Actions and GitLab CI let you specify filepath rules for triggering jobs.

Definitely not gonna defend Microsoft's naming, let alone their versioning!

I used it briefly when it first came out; otherwise no, my employers have used Slack.

Apparently the JS name was selected and announced in partnership with Sun from the very beginning, and Sun had the copyright over both Java and JapaScript up until the acquisition by Oracle. I had no idea, but that makes perfect sense.

Bugs around read-notifications are pretty bad. Slack still has those, but they're infrequent and transient, and often solvable with a hard-refresh.

I've never understood the hatred for Teams. I don't particularly like Slack, and Teams (from my limited experience using it) doesn't seem that much worse.

Oracle? Oracle owns Java, not JavaScript.

Edit: mea culpa! Sun owned both!

Kingdom of Heaven, I believe

https://askubuntu.com/q/641049

TL;DR: it's supposed to send email to an administrator, but by default on some distros (including Ubuntu), it isn't actually sent anywhere.

It's valid usage if you go waaay back, i.e. centuries. You also see it in some late 19th/early 20th century newsprint and ads.

No, because the thing they are naming is "The Github Dictionary"; they're not applying scare-quotes to the word "dictionary" implying that what they've written is not really a "dictionary".