[–] -4 points 5 months ago*

Plunder a country

Kidnap their people to make slaves

Impose anti-gay laws on them

200 years later: They are expanding the anti-gay laws! Why are they so backward?!

Pay reparations or shut up.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 3 points 5 months ago

    My oversimplified and possibly wrong understanding: this is like speculative decoding, but instead of a separate draft model (which does its own prompt processing), they use some diffusion thing strapped on top of the main model. The diffusion reuses the high-quality prompt processing result of the main model.

    The 7.8x faster claim sounds almost too good to be true. But even if we get like 3x then this is still a huge revolution in localLLMing.

  • source
  • [–] 89 points 6 months ago* (9 children)

    1.5 hours runtime for like half a liter of gasoline?? That's unbelievably inefficient. A half-liter of gasoline is like 15MJ, should power a laptop drawing 30W for a week.

    Maybe it would be better with a fuel cell.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Reinforcement learning makes the model better over time, so why should there be fewer and fewer good results?

    If you're talking about the rate of improvement going down, then yes, of course. That's bound to happen (unless you have an actual intelligence explosion, but in that case you won't know what "good results" even mean anyway).

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (2 children)

    No one feeds random LLM output straight back though. The whole idea of reinforcement learning is you take some ML model output, check if it is good, and push the model in that direction if it is good.

    As long as you believe that e.g. it's easier to verify a mathematical result than to come up with one, then RL should work.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    You took those quotes wildly out of context. Of course there is a hard limit on how much information can be extracted from data. Clever processing won't break that limit. But only in basic cases have we seen proofs that certain statistical inference methods make optimal use of the data. In complicated systems like neural nets it is basically impossible to prove such optimality. In fact the models are almost definitely not using the data optimally. Processing can help. A lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    This is great! The value of having your computational pipeline nicely debuggable and visualizable cannot be overstated.

    The float32 limitation sounds a bit arbitrary. Would be cool if blender allows float64 in geo nodes in the future.

  • source
  • submitted 9 months ago by to c/memes@lemmy.ml
     

    cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/46665693

    PieFed blocks !enoughmuskspam@lemmy.world (and a few other communities) by default. At the time of writing this post, you can search for the comm on many PieFed instances and you will not find it.

    The block is only by default. The admin can choose to override it. Many big instances have done so, including

    • piefed.social
    • piefed.world
    • piefed.zip

    See more information here.

    top: picture of flower yelling very angrily -- "when lemmy devs run their own instance and ban anticommunists". bottom: picture of flower putting its hand to its face shyly -- "when piefed devs hardcode block anti-Musk comm on every instance by default"
     

    Please try to consolidate discussions in the thread linked below:

    Crossposted from https://mander.xyz/post/46586274

    It's not guaranteed that the FCC will be built yet. But if CERN decides to build it, then these people will chip in 860M EUR.

    The people in question are "a group of friends of CERN, including the Breakthrough Prize Foundation, The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Fund for Strategic Innovation, and the entrepreneurs John Elkann and Xavier Niel".

     

    It's not guaranteed that the FCC will be built yet. But if CERN decides to build it, then these people will chip in 860M EUR.

    The people in question are "a group of friends of CERN, including the Breakthrough Prize Foundation, The Eric and Wendy Schmidt Fund for Strategic Innovation, and the entrepreneurs John Elkann and Xavier Niel".

    view more: next ›