[โ€“] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

While I do agree most presidents were in it for the power and money, Trump is particular in that he really seems to enjoy cruelty much more than any US president we have ever seen. Yes the previous ones did surely allow and tolerate cruelty for power, I think Trump would simply want cruelty even if it did not materially benefit him. Because with other people, money and position makes them feel powerful. With Trump, money, position and cruelty makes him feel powerful.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [โ€“] 1 point 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    Your question is unrelated to the statement I made. Does the "Markov machine" care if I own the means or not? Of all the tech advancements made to serve the billionaires, AI is perhaps the only one non billionaires were able to use in retribution, hence why they are scrambling to pass all these regulations regarding it and creating dooms day scenerios (apart from the PR aspect)

    Also it is not a Markov machine really (seems like you are using random technical words to look clever), if you have seen Markov chain text generators you will quickly spot the difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [โ€“] 18 points 4 weeks ago

    I mean two years ago it wasn't even that hard to side with anti-AI since even the simple code it produced was generally buggy, let alone making software with it. They just waited until it was more reliable and farmed some PR while waiting. That is the basic summary of every large company, minimize the path to profit.

  • source
  • view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ