[–] 2 points 3 days ago

I think it is entirely possible for it to be cool but still not great. I like AVs and a vehicle that is built for just autonomous operation does appeal to me. I just have doubts about how reliable it can be with just cameras as tracking and also think as a autonomous-only vehicle it does not go far enough as it is basically just a traditional EV with some things like mirrors, driver controls and rear window removed. The Zoox vehicle is a much more radical redesign than Cybercab.

I will say Tesla FSD does do a pretty good job when supervised but I would not trust it to necessarily handle difficult conditions or even do a job that is as good as the systems that utilize a more complete sensor suite.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    He still did everything in his power to fuck it up because he wanted the US military to remain there and keep filling the pockets of his Virginia war profiteering golf buddies. Such as?

    Yes. Like every US president.

    I made a different claim that you have not replied to, no doubt because you know you'd lose on the facts.

    Nothing you’re saying adequately contradicts my reply, nor does it support the original replier’s thesis. The American people had reason to believe that Donald wouldn’t start another forever war because his record was that of a president disentangling us from them.

    They absolutely did not and your reply that doesn't even try to address my arguments certainly does not convince anyone of it.

    You can blame Donald voters for a lot of things, but you can’t blame them for Iran, unless you’re comfortably making yourself look stupid.

    There's in fact a lot of reasons you could see Iran coming already from Donnie's earlier policy choices. You won't necessarily figure it out by just watching Fox News like it sounds you've been mostly doing though.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    That's false. At the end of the day it was Biden who is recorded in history as having withdrawn from Afghanistan though it is fair to say Trump wanted to make that happen and did some things to work towards it. It was also pretty clear that his support for Israel was more unquestioning and he actually contributed significantly to the destabilization of the middle east during his first term. He was also already doing some of what he's really been doing in a much bigger way to NATO and allies back then, another obvious destabilizing thing that may well lead to further conflict.

    The least understandable mistakes people who bought that he'd be some kind of a force for peace did were to think his extremely divisive attitude could not extend to war and thinking he could be trusted on anything he says.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I think that's very likely over. You could argue and people did that one Trump term was just an anomaly. Two is much more difficult to explain away like that and I think Europe gets it now.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Well, according to them we already have them: https://waymo.com/safety/impact/

    There are some limited third-party studies also supporting this but to be fair I think there's still more needed for independent verification. Of course, it also matters what exactly we consider safer, it is entirely possible that they could be the cause of more minor damage while also preventing deaths that would occur with humans at the controls.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    for trying to find as neutral as possible instance I don't think lemmy.ml was a particularly successful choice. Pretty sure even the choice of the .ml TLD is a reference to Marxism-Leninism.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    A BYOB bundle with each item you choose priced at €1.50 or less. This is a particularly good deal if you're interested in the classic tactical wargame series Close Combat as I don't think these games have ever been bundled at a price as low as this before.

    Pick from:

    Battle Academy

    Battle Academy 2: Eastern Front

    Close Combat - Gateway to Caen

    Close Combat : Panthers in the Fog

    Close Combat: Cross of Iron (CC3 modernization)

    Close Combat: The Longest Day (CC5 modernization)

    Close Combat: Wacht am Rhein (CC4 modernization)

    Radio Commander: Vietnam '64

    Field of Glory II: Medieval

    Field of Glory: Empires

    Fantasy General II

    plus a bunch of DLC for some of these games

     

    The video reviews both the visual translation (looking at text) as well as live transcription features of different smart glasses. There's some through the lens footage for all of them.

    The following glasses are included: Meta Ray-Ban display glasses Rokid Glasses RayNeo X3 Pro Even Realities G2 Inmo Air3 Inmo Go3

     

    The Qwen S1 specs have a heads-up waveguide display etched into the lenses, and serve as a rival to Meta's Ray-Ban Display model (minus the gesture control). My first impression of these AR glasses was that they were light and comfortable to wear -- I wouldn't have known that they were smart glasses by their weight alone. At the end of each arm are swappable batteries, which snap off easily so you can keep the glasses running for longer when you're on the go.

     

    The workers in Kenya say that it feels uncomfortable to go to work. They tell us about deeply private video clips, which appear to come straight out of Western homes, from people who use the glasses in their everyday lives.

    Several describe video material showing bathroom visits, sex and other intimate moments.

     

    In 2023, Bluesky's CTO Paul Frazee was asked what would happen if Bluesky ever turned against its users. His answer:

    it would look something like this: bluesky has gone evil. there's a new alternative called freesky that people are rushing to. I'm switching to freesky

    That's the same argument people made about Twitter. "If it goes bad, we'll just leave." We know how that played out.

     

    Meta sold more than seven million smart glasses last year. This is according to the annual report of the world's largest eyewear manufacturer EssilorLuxottica, which the company published on Wednesday evening. EssilorLuxottica develops and sells the smart glasses together with Meta.

    A year ago, it was said that two million smart glasses were sold and that the annual production capacity was to be increased to 10 million units by the end of 2026. In the summer, the company announced that sales had more than tripled compared to the previous year. A quarter later, EssilorLuxottica stated that smart glasses now accounted for a third of its revenue growth and that plans to increase production were being further accelerated.

     

    MSC Cruises is the latest one to ban smart glasses and this may be becoming more and more of a problem for people using them.

    Previously in Egypt tourists have reportedly been blocked from going to see the pyramids and some museums there also ban them. Saudi Arabian authorities apparently confiscate them at the airport from arriving passengers. Anyone who needs a prescription needs to consider that they may not be able to use them everywhere.

    view more: next ›