Humans evolved to pay close attention to danger, but today that instinct is being overwhelmed by an endless supply of bad news from around the world. Researchers say the answer isn’t to stop following current events—it’s to build healthier habits around how, when, and where we get our news.

top 97 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 216 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Oh, great… more bad news.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 4 months ago

    Don’t tell me that then, you’re just making it worse.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    I'm not sure I understand what "build healthier habits around how, when and where we get our news" exactly means and how that would help. I mean if TACO drops bombs on little kids, I can't think of how digesting this differently is going to be any healthier for me.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    It means that you are not in control of any of it. You can't impact any of it meaningfully as a single force, at least in real time. People used to watch a "news hour" once a day. You could artificially recreate that, and then detatch for the other 23 hours using self control, muted phone notifications and browser filter extensions. And maybe your brain will thank you.

    Of course you could have a separate rule for local alerts that may be more relevant, but local news is dying unfortunately, soo..... You could probably just check in once a week to see how the surviving local paper verbatim reprints favorable press releases from the city's PR person that they retain from the local municipal consultant group with a forgettable acronym.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    What is the question here? You take kids to do your work?! Die! You even just slightly have sexual dreams about kids?! Die twice! Kids must be protected and sadly that doesn't happen as much as you think. Anyhow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 52 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    And the people who are in charge and doing evil things know this and are using it to their advantage.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    It's literally written down as part of the playbook.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    I remember when Majorie Taylor Greene left the government she made a comment about something regarding a playbook she was given when she first came to Congress. I wish someone would dig into that more because I'm fairly certain it contained things like how to belittle people when they ask serious questions or how to revert to whataboutisms as soon as you're confronted with damning evidence.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 4 months ago* (3 children)

    I'd argue that it was never designed for this much stimulation full stop. All the constant noise and things competing for attention all the time around you. Bad news is just the nasty icing on the cake.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    One of the reasons I LOATHE advertising. They are legitimately overstimulating all of society and manipulating their thoughts at the same time. They are in actual fact, driving the world into literal psychosis. These people are beyond evil.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    The environment we have created is so fast-paced and complex that our brains are often in a constant state of overwhelm. We were never meant to be always available, always aware of everything and always caught in the belief that we have to react to everything at a time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago

    I am painfully aware.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Title is true even without the last two words.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Honestly it's true with just the first 5 words.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (15 children)

    Isn't this the thing we are doing by being on Lemmy? My mental state is better when I scroll the feed here, as opposed to scrolling reddit.

    I do both still, but I'm nearing the phase where Lemmy gets more attention.

    It's just fucked that I read too much so I might run out of content on Lemmy which pushes me to read the news then back to reddit untill I wake up again

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    You might take some of the time you're doomscrolling and read a silly book. Not a lot, like 30 mins.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I've found my attention span destroyed now. I don't read much any more at all, it's kinda sad.

    I think it's also because I work from home and a commute used to isolate me and I'd be forced to read.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    When you finally decide to leave reddit, remember to make some posts or comments inviting people to join lemmy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Oh no I've been banned so many times since the fascist took over

    Don't have an account anymore it's not worth it. Lurking is fine. Mental health way better not being able to respond

    It's really bad now even just saying fascists should be punished gets you banned. Imagine that.

    Here, I hope, I am free to say things. Even:

    Hang Elon musk and burn Trump alive. Prosecute all of the evil people to the max. Kill dictators, fight the power. Bleed for each other and see the new sun rise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (4 children)

    I've noticed recently that reddit just makes you a random username and you can comment without having an account. I'm sure it's still tracking you somehow but it's kinda nice to still comment on something you're looking up info for. I guess it makes sense with the AI modeling data usage now. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that they have enough data now to weigh comments based on the information they have about each user. Like if someone works in IT their comments get a little bit higher accuracy scores in the IT subs and same for any profession and it's corresponding sub.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    I haven't seen this and I don't think I'll ever return

    We all know it's been bad, getting worse

    Really at the point where reddit lost its grimey subs and even dropped support for darknet market subs was the big tell

    Then the API changes.. I still miss relay

    Does can go fuck himself and truly, the crowd on reddit now, meaning the current generation of Americans mostly, is completely and utterly retarded.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    As a low support needs retard myself I tend to agree with you. But your use of our word makes me question your priorities. And I've been told that the word hasn't been reclaimed enough even by my community to effectively use it this way yet. But we work towards a better tomorrow every day

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Hey man, I was raised by a mother whose worked with mentally handicapped people all my life. People with down syndrome are awesome

    I'm not American, and in my culture it's ridiculous to "claim a word". The people on reddit are not half as smart as the people I played with as a kid when I went to moms work like we often did. So excuse me but I'll say it again

    Reddit is full of actual retards

    Not nice people like you that respond with correct spelling and in context. No, you are not retarded enough to claim the word in my opinion even if you could claim a word.

    Sure it can be a derogatory term. But fuck man we need to be able to use language and have power words. It's exactly the problem in America where everything is appropriated and nothing is allowed because me me me that culture is going to hell.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Actually I just realized I was completely wrong about the reddit thing, I just made a profile on a different email account and forgot, apparently it was just logging me into reddit automatically and I didn't realize.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    This is a problem I struggle with philosophically. I have lived in the US with a degree of privilege and I feel the price for that should include knowing how the proverbial sausage is made, that is, knowing all the crap that is being done to allow me to live in (meager) comfort.

    It's Poor Things cranked up to eleven. The British empire is holding the beer of the American one. It's just too much.

    The continual rush of news, propelled by the addictive properties of the YouTube algo, have driven me quite mad, albeit, I suffer from behavioral health problems already. I haven't found a balance to this.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    Switching from Reddit to Lemmy did wonders for my mental health. Less time doom scrolling, more time to engage with my hobbies

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    I feel the opposite, my feed is almost entirely people describing how the world is falling apart, how communism is good but not that communism, and Linux

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Absolutely, lemmy has such a downer vibe to it, it’s not doing me any good using this platform lately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    We need more jokes around Lemmy, this is all communism this and that gays blahblahblah trump yapyapyap, holy cow. Sometimes I can't help but doomscroll on Reddit, missing the community and the jokes and the friends I had there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    You have control over what you see in your feeds. I was talking more about the volume in content on my feeds here. Could've worded my post better.

    I'm spending more time away from social media.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I agree with you, but I also agree with people commenting. I think reddit and the other corporate social media have really got their algorithms tweaked in such a way to keep you addicted to scrolling their apps. And the addictive stimulation of doom scrolling part makes Lemmy better. But I also agree with the other posters. To paraphrase someone much smarter and funnier than me reality has a real downer bias to it lately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    I don't engage with algorithmic content. I used Reddit through RSS and I browse Lemmy the same way.

    The problem with doing that on Reddit is that there was so much trash in my feeds I ended up developing my own filter system to make scrolling through it manageable. It got to a point where it felt like I was spending more time blocking content than engaging with it. Lemmy's smaller population means I'm spending less time reading and commenting, and spending more time doing other things with my life.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I've largely stopped actively following news because

    • most of it is stuff we knew already
    • I already find out all that I need to know and more involuntarily through occasional social media visits

    I'd like to read summaries of a given week's news on the world, EU, national, and maybe local level once a week, tho. I'll check if there's anything like this for the world and EU scale and report back here if there is.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    News apps are the worst because the algorithms will shove more of the same articles at you. "You liked a financial article? Ok, here are 50 more that are virtually identical." Then there is the constant click-bait. It has gotten to the point where I skip any dramatic or open ended headline because I know it is actually nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (1 child)
    • most of it doesn't affect you directly
    • you have almost no direct input on major world or regional events which become headline news

    Shit's happening in the world. You can do nothing to stop it from happening. This is in stark contrast to everything else going on in your life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago

    I find my days to be much better overall when I don't spend a lot of time online over an extended period. I’m more productive, more creative, and less anxious. I still find out all the impactful stuff, anyway.

    Its not like knowing the bad news as it happens helps me in any way, genuinely, so why bother wasting all my bandwidth on it?

    My dumb monkey brain is meant to tell five kinds of poisonous berries from the one edible kind. What does it do with an international pedophile ring, climate collapse, and rising inequality? Shuts down is what it does.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 4 months ago (15 children)

    My brain was not designed for anything. It was not designed.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    "The human mind has not adapted to this level of bad news"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I feel like it kind of has.

    Otherwise, people who are about 40+ years old would all be driven mad by now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago*

    I think I was wrong, the human mind adapts on the fly however it needs to. I should have kept it closer to the original: "The human brain has not adapted to this level of bad news." All of our minds have adapted, right, one way or another?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Your brain is one of the most artificial things in existence. How many years did you spend in formal education in one form or another? What is education other than a way of shaping a mind to a certain form?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (2 children)

    That's the mind, not the brain. The way I see it, the opposite mistake that I made elsewhere in the thread.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    I use RSS now for news.

    Its been so liberating. I can read offline, save articles for later, no ads or paywalls, no algorithms, no bullshit.

    I highly recommend.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I've been doing the same. The issue is finding high quality feeds with full articles. Most are just a snippet of the article with a link saying "read the full story at..." (The Verge, PBS, The Guardian). Others are even worse and just link directly to the shit-laden website (Ars Technica). The best quality news feeds I've found are Techdirt and The Intercept. Would you care to share some good RSS news feeds you've found?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    So for those style websites, FreshRSS (my server)/and CabyReader (my client) offer options to parse the linked article for content.

    They mostly get the full article without tinkering but other sites I use css selectors to get the article section of the website.

    Then I press the "parse" button if the article is just a summary and it'll get the whole article.

    That said, I do put more emphasis on following individuals rather than large sites like those you mentioned. So I have a couple dozen individual blogs followed, but also a handful of sites like NewScientist, BigThink, AndroidPolice, TinyBuddha, VICE

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 95 points 4 months ago (13 children)

    Your brain wasn't designed at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    Iteratively designed by evolution to maximize survival, I guess

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, so you could easily say we evolved to, or our brains evolved to... And so on

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (5 children)

    Evolution did as much design as my socks design themselves to stay in their drawer. Evolution doesn't design, it works with what it has and nothing else. It doesn't even optimize because optimization requires choosing between options with intent. Evolution has zero intentions. Evolution creates un-"optimized" things that go extinct all the time, but it's not because it "failed" at designing because that implies it "tried" to design, but because it's not a designer, it can't design. No design made fish have legs. No design gave elephants their tusks and no design gave flies their wings. Evolution won't 'design' new vertebrae segments, but they still might happen---it just won't be because of any design.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Natural selection is actually technically an optimisation algorithm. Its just a kind of crappy one that only ever finds local maximas because it can't traverse valleys (the thing just dies). So we end up with optical receptors on the wrong side of our retina. Ooof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    In Soviet Russia, observing an event changes your outcomes.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    It's part of why I'm now only looking at socials for like 30m a day- and usually only lemmy and YT at that. I have enough problems to worry about over here, I don't need to know about all these other problems that I couldn't even fix if I tried

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    its by design from murdoch, to putin and bannon its called flooding the zone, so your other heinous acts get drowned out. its whats trump doing in the news right, epstein is barely registering at all on news right now.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    19 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post