just like florida does, build in flood plains.
post
If lenders require insurance, and insurers won't cover it, shouldn't it stop happening anyway?
Florida does the same. Shortly after moving out of the state, we heard from a friend still there that a builder was approved to build 500 new homes in the wetlands around Northport and port Charlotte. For those that don't know, the current homes already have major flood issues just from normal rain and are underwater every hurricane. This is just making it worse.
If there is a acknowledgement that what you are building is in a natural flood zone, why not build according to the environmental conditions of the area?
There must be homes designs that don't look like the typical "American dream" single family home.
Something on stilts comes to mind.

A house that looked almost exactly like this was swept away by the flood. It was an incredibly sad story (the family described the event in great detail). The family probably did everything they could've done. At a certain point the government NEEDS to intervene. A family can't reasonably do their own weather analysis, flood plane analysis, or build and maintain their own alert system.
probably would be too expensive, and cost prohibitive, and even if they make that kind of house flooding can be severe enough where it can still destroy a house.
This would work for areas that flood gradually. The flooding that happened had fast moving water. And water of that volume moving that fast is like an unstoppable force. I would trust that structure to hold up.
Texas Tribune is legit one of the best independent media not funded by any billionaire asshats, please do support them if you can!
If we’re so desperate for places to build maybe a declining birth rate is a good thing
top 19 comments