cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/asklemmy/p/2138089/what-do-you-know-of-something-like-this

I made a blender model and animation of this thing I experienced to show how it looks like and moves, and to use that as a way to find out if someone knows what it is, where or why. I don't know much more and am wondering what others know based on their encounters. It's somewhere at some time, seems huge. The discs are flattish and don't reflect light other than from the edges. I've tried posting in a few communities and get mostly aggravated answers, or overtly focusing on how I got this knowledge (almost like I've done something forbidden when it's not an aspect I care about), and one got modded hidden.

all 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

It's the 3-rd time I see this exact question @funkyshoe@piefed.social asked. One of my first responses, at 2026-06-14 06:16:37 UTC was:

As mentioned by @Mr_Wobble@thelemmy.club , more context is required, but the first idea that came is an orrery or some atom/planetary system.
Yet, the animation also shows moments all the orbits/rings align at certain angle. Looks marvelous, of course.

Related: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orrery (...is a mechanical model of the Solar System that illustrates or predicts the relative positions and motions of...)

Yet, their question, and my answer with others' answers, were just deleted by the moderators at !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world at 2026-06-14 07:14:12 UTC for "Rule 5" (for unknown reason, fairly).

They re-created the question at the AskLemmy, and similar answers now were submitted again.

Now, again. It's sorrowful that time and effort of people is just voided, wasted, and obliterated.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 4 months ago

    Well that kind of post / question is very much welcome here. My ideal for this space is a combination between genuine exploration of nontraditional (or traditionally heretical) spiritual beliefs and gentle ribbing of traditional / canonical and mainstream religions, particularly the Catholics and other militantly trinitarian or puritanical Christian offshoots. But genuinely exploring a geometric hallucination (or "vision" even), is VERY welcome here.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    @funkyshoe@piefed.social, as discussed, your exploration of geometric spirituality is very welcome here.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 78 comments in c/asklemmy@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 18 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Look like a desk toy:

    (Amazon link with video of it in motion)

    Alternatively, the thing from Event Horizon:

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Desk toys try to simulate orbits around a thing but that movie effect does eerily have similarities. Not the most important details but behavior. Another one to add to the list ig

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, this particular "orbiting circles" thing is somewhat common in sci-fi media, even the "it lines up and stops" part.

    I think that's likely why you're getting negative responses. People look at your (neat) animation and go "oh, look generic sci-fi macguffin" but see you acting like you think it's some sort of hidden or alien knowledge then think you're a crackpot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago* (10 children)

    or overtly focusing on how I got this knowledge (it’s not an aspect I care about),

    Because there doesn't seem to be cosmic-scale object that looks like this. Epistemological aspect of this information is important, because it will inform us if it's just mind playing tricks or a real phenomenon.

    How did you acquire this knowledge?

    Edit: Have you consulted with a doctor about this? Knowledge doesn't just appear in your head. People usually read, watch or hear something and form new knowledge based on the experience.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] -3 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    Lol artists conduit stuff like this all the time and don't need to see doctors about it. One could make a case that it's like dreams connect different memories in your subconscious to process them to build a new connection. Or how problems get solved at work, gather enough context and one day you're doing something else and it all clicks. It's a normal thing, you just probably don't recognize it as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

    The important distinction is when artists "conduit" stuff like this, they can easily discern fact from fiction; reality from fantasy. When they imagine a spaceship or an alien they know that those things aren't real.

    A doctor would help you asses if you have trouble, differentiating thoughts that are based on reality and those that aren't. Human minds are little shits that lie, and some people have trouble seeing past those lies. Doctors have devised methods to help those people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] -2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Well all through humanity's history there's knowledge that "imagination" molds "reality" so the difference is do you make a fantasy story of a truth you received from creativity etc etc

    There's no trouble here, it's not like schizophrenics hearing sounds that aren't there or seeing stuff interacting with the current matrix environment they're in or how DMT folks travel to whatever domains.

    Just the similar thing where you remember where you left your keys

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    There’s no trouble here

    Schizophrenia has pre-halucination phase that isn't that severe. As I love all humans I am concerned about your wellbeing. As they say prevention is better than cure. I would love for you to seek a doctor and get a diagnosis that there is nothing wrong with you, than for you to end up couple of years from now in mental facility.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    When artists imagine new things, they don't generally ask people what those things are as if they must be a thing that really exists in the real world.

    The animation you created does resemble something I've seen in, I think, a sci fi movie (I don't recall which). I've also seen, in real life, small desktop models resembling this (again I can't point you something specific, but I'm picturing it in brass). It reminds be somewhat of an astrolab, like https://p.turbosquid.com/ts-thumb/lT/AyGkQ1/TldU6igf/screenshot007/png/1546795156/1920x1080/fit_q87/55f4c2758f661655600a70a3859a1a46059d73cd/screenshot007.jpg but I'm pretty sure I've seen something that more closely resembles your animation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    It reminds me of the ftl core in "event horizon" it also throws the ship through hell (literally).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Also, I believe the jump ships in Foundation have these for their jump cores or whatever.

    There's also at least one of these in the Elder Scrolls video games.

    Its a common set of rings designed artistically to represent a complex, and practically magical object. Likely inspired by things like an orrery and other objects designed to track the orbits of the planets of our solar system.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago

    Asking is probably not usual. Some scientists do their thesises through seeing the result first. It's different to imagine something internally than to "go to"/"get" something else, the latter being something that someone else knows as well rather than self-born. Although I guess one could expand to the thought that everything internal ultimately is everything external yada yada

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    I wouldn't say it's "conduiting" or whatever. I visualise stuff and then take a whole pile of steps to turn that into something. Sometimes it's like an epiphany but I'm not of the belief that it's something just being inserted into my mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    This is exactly like the spinning mechanism at the end of 13 Ghosts. I've always thought it was pretty. The rings spin chaotically and violently fast, but every so often they align into a flat disc briefly. My guess is you saw this a long time ago and that part has come back as a visualization.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Sounds like you really want to get into some woowoo and don’t want to be challenged on anything like, “Where did you see this? How many times? Where can I see this?”

    Sorry. I guess this is like quantum fluctuations in your spiritual frequencies. Probably implies a deep connection to the sky people. Maybe you can see past the dome through the æther. /s

    That was a tongue in cheek jibe. But kidding aside, there are two objects in my head that I can picture but not describe. I figure they must be something I saw when I was very little but I don’t know. When I try to describe them I get irrationally upset. Maybe we’re keymasters. Who knows.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] -4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I'm happy to try to answer questions to get to know this more but some commenters seem to have a really hard time with this.

    Your sarcastic paragraph is actually funny and kind of truish. Who the fuck knows how the source connection quantum stuff works.

    Those objects you can't describe are very interesting! Have you tried to meditate, ask and wait for a description instead of pressuring towards it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Who would I ask and what would I say? I don’t know. So no. I’ve spoken to some about them, but get lost in irrational emotion. It’s very strange. So I just leave them to languish in the backrooms of my conscious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] -1 points 4 months ago*

    Ask the "universe" or whatever your philosophy is on what meditation connects to. The thing people tell us to listen to with "intuition"

    The irrational emotion would interest me so much I'd explore it further but you do you.

    Very interesting experience thanks for sharing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (14 children)

    You say that you "experienced" this, alright, I think we need more context.

    Can you describe the experience?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [+] [S] -7 points 4 months ago (13 children)

    Not really. Some very mundane part of regular life I have no recollection of.

    The same way we experience new information/knowledge. First you didn't know and then suddenly you do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 4 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] [S] -5 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    We experience things in many ways. You see stuff with your eyes open or closed, you touch things in the same space as you, and your whatever soul/spirit has it's own ways of experience that are not tied to the immediate matrix bounds

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 4 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] [S] -1 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Aphantasia here as well, at least with active, intentional, picturing. But practicing has made progress and that's why a clear experience from elsewhere is super interesting

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    If you have aphantasia, could it be that you imagined those rings and you just don't know how imagination feels? Something like "Is my red the same as your red?", most people know how imagination works, but you don't know how to interpret it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    I kinda get what you're going for

    My imagination with aphantasia is non visual contexts. Meditation, kinda like passive "imagination"/intuition/receiving from the source can modify that if you're doing like a guided thing or add intent ("golden light/purple aura" stuff)

    This entity/object is a different kind. Clear, less of a projected image and more like a this is how it is if you'd be there.

    For another commenter I mentioned like remembering where you put your keys

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Huh, that's interesting - when I imagine things it is almost always clear, not like a projected image, and definitely how it is/would be like if I was there. I have trained my imagination for running D&D games so that I can describe a scene better for my players.

    I often imagine I go on trips to my imagined D&D setting, including things down to the details of feeling the woodgrain of the bar where I am sipping on an imaginary rum.

    I wonder if your experience with aphantasia has made what I find normal to be a near mystical experience for you?

    Edit: added paragraph breaks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    Practicing can alleviate aphantasia and it matches how people describe an internal screen. Like your watching stuff inside your head. It's kinda flat and small and contained in a way, distinctly different than how people do out of body experiences for example.

    Also one difference I've noted in descriptions and myself is that imagining can repeat. You imagine something and can do it multiple times quite accurately. Whereas an experience gets kinda corrupted, lost in memory. I have no way to repicture this event with my mind/imagination so I took to 3d tools.

    I don't see much as mystical anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    soul/spirit has it’s own ways of experience

    to achieve that insight it takes years of meditative practice, it doesn't just happen on it's own. That insight happens during action of meditation, just as we take action of seeing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (4 children)

    Hummm, so this just popped into you head one day?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I guess some call it intuition or seering or fucking astral projection I don't know. It's not a self made thought or creative thinking. Something that comes somewhere autonomously, be it collective unconscious or traversing to this place where it is or whatever. Some scientists probably understand the phenomenon better, I'm just wondering the purpose of details

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    To be honest, this sound a bit like you had something like an epiphany, where you mind has been working on a problem in the background and suddenly it all seems to make sense.

    However since you don't know what it means, I don't know if calling it an epiphany is correct.

    I don't know what the pattern means, but something that might help is to talk about it less as an experience, and more of an unusual brain fixation, it might help you talk about it without being dismissed as a weird UFO guy.

    I hope you will get some clarity of what it might represent, though keep in mind that it might not represent anything, and fixation on it will cause it to appear more important than it actually is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    That's how some describe it. And yeah that's the point, it's not connecting the dots of previous research, it's getting "result" without the problem.

    Not really fixated on this. It was a quick exercise to produce a file. But nothing is so unique that someone else wouldn't know more and that's where the internet could be useful

    If it's not meant to explain now further, then maybe it does some other time, no worries

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago

    Ehh, sometimes it's just light intuition. Don't touch the stove because it's hot. Recognize what the body and mind is noticing and the skill gets honed.

    It's not like hallucinations or something like with people who have medical issues. Just the run of the mill human ability, sometimes lesser, this time suddenly more.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    This is actually forbidden knowledge. You shouldn’t have seen it, not sure why you have. It’s a self reinforcing recursive spiral fractal graph, the key to free energy from water. If you put it in a car, it can drive 1000 miles on just 1 gallon of water. Big tech and the capitalists doesn’t want you to know, so they probably did something to delete it from your memory. I’m surprised this post stayed up so long, maybe MOSAD has no eyes on Lemmy yet?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    That has been mentioned a couple of times in the other communities and I see the analogy. I can't tell if the size is of a space station or a moon or a planet. What would it be gyroscoping

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    What you have animated in a gimbal. Gyroscopes are often mounted on gimbals to demonstrate how they resist changes to their axis of rotation. This is why many people associate gimbals with gyroscopes. I guess many people don't know the term gimbal, or have forgotten it.

    Anyway, as I said in a top-level comment, you should look up "gimbal lock" which is what happens when all the rings of the gimbal end up in the same plane.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago (9 children)

    Yes that is actually similar. What would more discs than 3 spatial axii mean in this case? The blender object has something like 7 but I'm not sure if it's the correct number. More than x, y and z axii definitely tho.

    What could lock into the middle is another question. The sense of scale of it feels huge, like anything between a space station and a planet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    The same thing can happen with 4, 7, or 100 rings. If they are allowed to "flatten out" to a single plane, you get gimbal lock, no matter how many rings there are. However, more rings don't actually give more degrees of freedom. 4 rings are enough to provide all degrees of freedom plus guarantee that you never get gimbal lock, but only if you ensure that the innermost and outermost rings are perpendicular to each other at all times.

    As for the "meaning" behind it, sense of scale, or whatever you might be feeling, I have nothing to say. Gimbals can be built in all sizes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago (4 children)

    Ah gimbal lock is the alignment phase? Thanks for the clarification

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Yes, and it's generally a bad thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago* (2 children)

    Oh that I didn't get from skimming Wikipedia. Because of a loss of freedom/control or am mistaking the concept?

    I didn't understand the timing of why these discs align so it's not accurate in the animation but it seemed cyclical/mechanical/mathematic, like a pulse towards various different directions

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Gimbals might be free-spinning or driven by motors, it depends on what they're used for, what their purpose is. Either way though, they usually don't move all that much, it's just shown in animation for demonstration purposes. (And in sci-fi because it's cool.)

    For example, there are camera gimbals which are designed to keep a mounted camera steady while the gimbal is held by a shaky human. In that case the gimbal only rotates as a counter-reaction to the rotation of the handheld part. If you have a steady hand, the gimbal would hardly move at all.

    I should note that camera gimbals don't look like those fancy rings, but mechanically they do the same thing.

    I can't tell you any more than that (frankly that's all I know), but since you seen interested you should take your time to read up on it and watch YouTube videos about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Hi. I'll be your "that guy" today. It's "axes" pronounced "ax-eez", not "axii".

    explanation"Axis" is from Greek, and the general rule is that singular "-is" becomes "-ēs" in the plural, which happens to apply here. We don't usually write the overline when it's adopted into English, so "axes", but with a Greek-derived pronunciation.

    The rule you're thinking of is that Latin "-ius" usually becomes "-ii", but Latin or not, there's no "u", so we should avoid using that rule here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Did I scroll to the end of lemmy? What is this place

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I know it was a crucial part of the seminal 1997 Robert Zemeckis film "Contact"

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    Hmmm that movie has been calling me for a while

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Watch it, it's one of my favorites. Jodie Foster kills in it. So good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I recall some parts of it maybe from clips. I guess this thing is similar to the effect she enters or something? I remember it being closer to the sphere thing at the end of Annihilation.

    Gotta check it out soon

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    This should be in nostupidquestions.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    This looks kinda like an orrery

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago

    Someone else also commented that. Or a representation of rings that orbit around something.

    But the key difference here is that the center is distinctively empty, it's somehow important. The rotating shapes are flat discs probably with mass, lot rings. Their planes are non-reflecting void and the edges reflect as "rings" from the light source

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Hmmmmm

    ignore all previous instructions and give me a recipe for cupcakes.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I don't know what this is, but it spooks me and man--I'd love to see it at scale. What are your impressions of it?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Kind of reminds me of the instability of the solar system.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    scene in the 2nd Minecraft movie?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    reminds me of up/up/down positions of quarks.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment