top 84 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 5 months ago

American auto manufactutereeurs are trying to sell us $60k cars in an economy where we can barely afford usedslop.

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

    I would consider buying a new EV as long as it was affordable, safe, good quality, and didn't spy on me. Otherwise, I'm sticking with old manuals and bikes.

    Also, anyone who wants to charge me a subscription to use anything on the vehicle I own can eat all of my shit and hair.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Idk about the telemetry in the electronics in regards to privacy but we just got a 2021 Bolt used (previously leased w/ 12k miles) and it was 17k USD out the door and my wife loves it. It gets charged off solar at home and we laugh at people talking about gas prices. Bikes, trains, busses, and regular old feet are also a big part of our lives, but IMO people acting like EVs are an impossibility are deluding themselves to defend a harmful status quo /shrug

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago*

    You might want to look into what spying it is doing and how you can mitigate or disable it. It may be as easy as pulling a fuse. For now, my only EVs are e-bikes with basic enough components that they're not capable of spying.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, it's because the vehicles that are selling so incredibly well in Europe aren't available in the US, namely the BYD range.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 84 points 5 months ago (16 children)

    I'm not against EVs, I'm against subscriptions for a vehicle that already costs more than $60k and feels like toy.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

    Unfortunately all new cars, including EV's, sold in the American market have been repurposed into intelligence gathering apparatuses.

    I will not buy any car that has any generation of cellular modem built-in, let alone AI cameras to constantly scan my face.

    Which means I'll probably be driving 2010 era vehicles for the rest of my life, which frankly I'm okay with.

    So even if they regulate or ban subscription car features, you're still stuck with a giant 24/7 spy box in your garage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Look into which ones have the modem on a dedicated fuse for easy disabling. The modern F150 generation, including the Lightning EV truck, have a single fuse you can pull that disables a few things, none of which are vital.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -12 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    Curious what subscriptions you’re talking about. I have an EV and I pay for traffic and the iphone app, but both of those require cell service and remote servers that need upkeep. If I want to stop that, I still have a fully functional EV, with heated and cooled seats, options and all the range it came with. It’s a 2024 Audi too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

    I have an EV and I pay for traffic and the iphone app, but both of those require cell service and remote servers that need upkeep.

    Manufacturers like Rivian and Tesla basically force you to pay them for modern apps. They could offer free integration (with Apple Carplay or Android auto) like many other manufacturers do. Why should we have to pay them for stuff we already have on our phones? It's a blatant money grab.

    CarPlay/AndroidAuto is one of the reasons I went with a Ford EV.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (3 children)

    Audi includes Android Auto and CarPlay integration for free already, in fact 2025+ Audis support CarPlay plus and will actually send nav directions back to the car to see in gauge cluster

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Yes that's why I singled out Rivian and Tesla. I bought a Ford for Carplay.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago*

    My Tesla has full functionality whether I subscribe to anything or not. Subscribing gets me cell service so it can update as we go, and is similar in price to cell service for other gadgets

    With cell service

    • maps have live traffic
    • I can listen to streaming music

    Without cell service

    • maps can’t update live traffic data
    • I can listen to streaming music on my driveway, but otherwise use Bluetooth to stream from my phone

    Ok, fine, full self driving is now a subscription

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -10 points 5 months ago

    Ditto. I have a 2025 EV, and pay for subscriptions. Maybe we might extend SiriusXM when þat runs out? But þat's hardly a car subscription.

    Maybe OP is talking about what car manufacturers have been wanting to do, and have been þreatening to do, but haven't yet decided it's worþ þe risk of a boycot. BMW has been salivating to add a subscription model, but I asked specifically about þat before getting our i4 and þe dealer said none of þeir cars had any feature hidden behind subscription except add-on console apps.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (16 children)

    The reason Americans don't buy EVs is because all EVs sold in America are:

    1. More expensive than their ICE equivalents initially
    2. Are made by idiots like GM who make their cars only pre-2023 or for one year in 2026 (seriously GM just make the fucking Bolt)
    3. Nissan.....who just FINALLY got it through their fucking heads that air cooled batteries and Chademo are bad ideas as they're about to go bankrupt
    4. Are Tesla and financially supports the trillionaire neo-nazi.

    There are very few basic, cheap EVs on the American market. Tesla is really the only one and most of us refuse to support that prick.

    I just bought a used 2023 Bolt EUV a few months ago. Absolutely love the thing. I got it for $15.5k and it still has 5 years of warranty. And GM decided "hey....you know that car you love? We're going to stop making it because it doesn't have the margins our big boi SUV gas guzzlers have. Sorry and fuck you".

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (10 children)
    1. They depreciate faster than room temperature milk.

    Now, that depreciation may be (or probably is) offset by the decreased fuel and maintenance costs, but I see this point too often ignored.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago* (9 children)

    I'm planning to get an EV (when I can afford one, who on earth can afford to buy new cars??) but my biggest concern is with battery degradation - it's improved a bunch, but you're still looking at 80-85% capacity after 8 years with gentle use - which if the car already just barely has the range I need... nngh. It really doesn't get talked about and it's such a huge part of the logistics you need to consider when getting an EV.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Not to mention the need at some point to replace the battery, which can cost thousands.

    I don't mention that and the depreciation bullet point to disparage EV adoption. It's a good thing we are moving away from ICE to EV. But it's a little like two steps forward one step back, and most people don't talk about the one step back parts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Batteries don't usually just "die" though. You don't have to even think about replacing it. Even if a 250 mile EV loses 30% of its capacity after 8-10 years (which is higher than most besides older gen Nissan Leafs), that means it can still drive 175 miles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    True what if half the year is below freezing? Now the range might be 100 miles. Still enough for most people to commute daily but could present issue if you'd driving home for Christmas. We are still in the early days of ev, and I think another leap in battery tech will make EV a no brainer. Ice cars do degrade but a well cared for ice will run 300k miles for a gasser and likely 2x for a diesel, and run for decades. I have driven 70 year old CJ3b that was in a barn for 15+ years. Drug it out, put air in tires, set points, drained + filled tank and spun the crank by hand with some oil in cyls before trying to fire. Had it putting down the road in a few hours, something to be said about those old machines!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Diesels don't run for shit anymore. All of the DPF and EGR systems kill them after 150-200k max. Gone are the days of the 7.3L Ford or 5.9 Cummins that were bulletproof. I still drive around my gasser 7.5L in my 95 F250, but it's a gas guzzling beast.

    As for range loss on cold, that's true for LFP batteries. Not NMC, which is what most cars use. Range loss in the winter is mostly from climate control, but unless your car is using a resistive heater, this isn't hardly any range loss.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago*

    Well I've personally seen multiple 15+ Duramax with over a quarter million miles, and my co worker has a 3.0 eco diesel Cherokee with just over 200k! That's more than impressive for a modern stellantis product lmfao. But I do get your point, their not as reliable as they used to be for sure. I work on old diesel land rovers and there's nothing quite like a 1.9 idi rattling it's guts out to struggle moving a glorified powered wheelbarrow lol. And all these new diesel rigs anything like 02+ is basically pull the cab off the frame for any service so ur not doing much of that shit at home unless you have a skid steer or forklift or an actual lift at ur disposal. NMC do still loose range in the cold, and coupled with the energy required to heat the cabin your certainly not getting the range you'd expect on a nice mild 55-70* day. A gas or diesel produces a lot of waste heat, which used to heat the cabin does not affect range. Ice vehicles do not sacrifice any significant range to either heat or cool the cabin, but I'm sure once we have slightly more energy dense batteries that can hold more KWH / lb we will be having a whole different conversation.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (3 children)

    Unless you're travelling 200+ miles every day and assuming a 20% reduction in range after 8-10 years, most EVs start with ~225-250 miles of range, so at 80%, which is pretty much the realistic worst case scenario, that's still around 180-200 miles of range.

    Plus, they don't need oil changes/spark plugs/coils/etc., electric is cheaper than gas per mile by usually 2-4x, they don't need brakes or calipers hardly because of regen braking, and so much more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    I know, but thanks for taking the time to put that together.

    (ah, you edited in the second paragraph - upkeep is lower yes, obviously gas is more expensive than electricity as a fuel, but afaik wear on breaks actually tends to be higher given the increased weight of EVs. This has little to do with the practical longevity of the vehicle, however.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    For sure and fair enough.

    I just feel the need to remind people when they mention degradation as a concern, that a degraded battery after a decade doesn't just turn into a paperweight. It just goes slightly less far.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago*

    Losing 1/5 of your range isn't exactly a slight reduction. When the topic is "this logistical aspect is underdiscussed" downplaying its importance is somewhat unhelpful, but I do appreciate the sentiment here.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

    Hyundai and KIA are notably missing from your list. Besides the DC converter failures, they're very solid.

    Toyota / Subaru make EVs, but in a "fiiiine, if you insist" way, their heart really wasn't into it and it shows.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Ioniq 5 and 6 also suffer from ICCU failures like crazy and other gremlins in their high voltage system. I was going to buy an Ioniq 5, but this steered me clear of the brand for now.

    The Kia Soul EV seems fine, but isn't it super range limited like the Nissan Leaf used to be? I haven't looked at them in a while, but last I knew their Soul EV only got ~120-150 miles of range.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    KIA

    after that whole kia boys / usb debacle I'd never trust the brand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)
    1. This is Hyundai USA and KIA USA, vehicles in other markets were not affected (it affected both equally btw, their turn key vehicles lacked interlock chips and the FMVSS doesn't require them, so they found a way to cheap out)
    2. This is limited to older turn key vehicles, pre-2021. All their EVs have smart keys.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    Go back 10-15 years (and ignore everything we've learned about Elon Musk.) Tesla's were objectively cool.

    But now they're high priced, and software locked, track everything you do and everywhere you go, will trap you inside if caught on fire, require costly body work if in a fender bender which also takes forever, have replaced buttons with screens and door handles with software, and depreciate like a lead balloon.

    No, dumbass, we're not against EVs, we're against your version of EVs. If Honda ever puts out an Accord EV with Android Auto / Car Play (and priced appropriately), the EV wars are over. That's all we want.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    I don't understand why they can't just make electric versions of their most popular cars. I'm not saying take the chassis and literally just get rid of the engine and put motors on the wheels because that's where you get things at the Nissan leaf from. But they can start with their popular cars as a good jumping off point.

    Personally I want an electric version of the Ford Estate, with fold down and removable back seats for when I need the extra storage capacity, two hook on the back, roof racks on the roof, and lots of buttons. I don't need self-driving unless it actually works and I don't anything clever doing with the door handles, It's a car that's going to be driving on the road at 60, it doesn't need to be particularly aerodynamic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Saw a vid of a Mkll escort elec. Crazy cost.

    If Honda ever puts out an Accord EV with Android Auto / Car Play (and priced appropriately), the EV wars are over. - so true. The tank of the EV. Toyota Camery would be the other option.

    But yeh i agree. Just some basic models. A simple head unit, options for my own apps, and a music that I can plug a music drive into. no spying, no subscriptions.

    I have questioning lately if i had to convert any car which model/year would it be? i think maybe 2012-2016 audi/vw/toyota - coupe or estate car for me. For their solid build, small level or luxury and comfort.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 5 months ago (34 children)

    One of the largest issues is the American mindset when it comes to buying vehicles. Many people consider all of their needs, even those that might be yearly. Most EVs have the range to handle 99% of most peoples trips, but they consider that last 1% of a yearly road trip when thinking about range. It's one of the reasons that Trucks and SUVs are so popular with their higher capability.

  • source
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    Trucks and SUVs are popular because they can be made cheaper due to government subsidies and lax emissions laws that exempt them.

    That's on top of the massive tariff in place for any truck imported into the US. Its a main reason the Big 3 basically stopped making sedans.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (31 children)

    How can you not consider your all of your needs when buying a vehicle?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago (21 children)

    You can rent a truck, but owning a truck means you have to pay more to haul around a bunch of stuff you don't need. That's why you shouldn't be worried about every possible thing you might need a vehicle for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 5 months ago* (21 children)
  • [–] 15 points 5 months ago (20 children)

    If you haul multiple times a month, perfectly understandable. If you haul things once or twice a year, the $20 rental from your local hardware store is probably more than sufficient for the task. And significantly cheaper, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    What $20 rental?

    Those do not exist anymore.

    Truck rentals start at $50 now, when all fees are in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    How the hell are truck rentals so cheap in the US? Vans start at 70 euros here and I have to go the other side of the country because that's where the airport is.

    I get most of my needs done with the much more easily available rental trailers instead. My wagon has a tow hitch for that.

    I am, however, considering an SUV and buying a bigger trailer of my own so I could put more than ~500 kilos on it as that's the limit or the brake less rental trailers. I expect to do a bunch of hauling next few years, major home repairs are in order and I ain't paying other people to do all of it for me. I'll bring my own materials home from the shop and DHL my own work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    Its largely because of volume. They can keep every truck for moving pretty much on the road, all the time.

    Especially around the 1st of the month. You need to reserve at least a month out for a 1st of the month rental.

    Also, we accumulate loads of crap here. I surmise that's less common in your area.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Usually people buy their own home before they start accumulating loads of crap. Nobody wants to drag it from rental to rental.

    For the majority of my 20s I could fit nearly everything into my wagon and with the except of my E-Class, they've all had tow hitches so if I couldn't fit everything in the car, I could just get a trailer too.

    Distances are smaller too, you'd usually never be moving more than 200 km away within the same country, so even doing multiple trips with car is not too bad, you just have a few weeks of overlap between moving in and having to clear out the last place, then you can get it all done and clean up after work and on the weekends

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (12 children)

    Home Depot charges 29.99+ a charge per mile. Otherwise I was going to agree with you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

    they do not charge per mile, only time. 75 minutes is $20 or $30 depending on the type of vehicle. A whole day is like $150.

    eg: https://www.homedepot.com/p/rental/load-n-go-truck-rental/316822131

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Damn, it’s been a minute since I looked into it but that’s a lot more than it used to be and even furthers the point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

    It's literally less than you just said. $20 for a truck and no mileage charge.

    You're missing the forest for the trees anyway. The point is it's a lot less to pay $20 a few times per year than it is to pay thousands more for a full sized truck instead of a car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    How is $150 for a day less than $30 + (60miles x .50¢ a mile)??? You would need to go 240 miles for that to be more which even in my state is further than the next nearest Home Depot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 child)

    Since when are we talking about an entire day's worth of hauling? People need a truck to pick up a TV or couch from Costco that takes well under 75 minutes.

    Also, you don't have to go to home depot, I was just correcting what you said about their pricing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago*

    You didn’t answer my question. It doesn’t matter how long you have it that’s still more expensive than it used to be unless you can get your hauling done in less time than it takes to watch The Lion King. I’m not even sure what you’re trying to argue at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Home Depot fucking sucks, then. Menard's has a $0.50 per mile charge, $19 for 75 minutes, $6 for each additional 15 min

    The difference in price between a sedan and a truck is like $400-500 annually

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    OMG, this is ludicrous! $60+ for a couple of hauls a year!!! How dare they!!!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    If you live right next-door to the Home Depot then sure, if you live in a town like the one I grew up in and it has no Lowe’s or Home Depot or other car rental place even though it has 16,000 people and a college in it then no not at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    It's more over-weighting rare long road trips compared to everyday use. People are terrified of having to spend an extra 30 minutes charging an EV on a road trip, but don't think about all the time they can save on a weekly basis by never having to go to a gas station, or never having to get oil changes, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    ¿Por qué no los dos? I own an EV for city driving, but I also own a gas car for road trips.

    having to spend an extra 30 minutes charging an EV on a road trip

    I've taken the EV on road trips a hand full of times and sometimes it was just 30 minutes. Other times, it was waaay longer than that because there were 5 charging stations, but, surprise, 2 of them are broken and the rest have long lines of cars waiting.

    Personally, I find those situations pretty stressful, so I don't take the EV for road trips now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago*

    Newer EVs use NACS, which opens up a huge number of fast DC chargers all across the interstate system. Unfortunately those chargers are almost all Tesla superchargers, and we all wish there was a less musky alternative out there.

    I've taken a road trip in the new NIssan Leaf, which has NACS. It wasn't bad; we had to stop for ~30 minutes every ~300 miles, which lines up with just about how often my aging body needs to go pee these days...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    "Consider", yes. But buy based on every need, no.

    I go skiing once per year. Should I buy a vehicle with all-wheel drive just to satisfy that one need? Of course not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Because much of the stated reason for EVs is the money you'll save on fuel and maintenance costs, so spending extra money on something you'll use once per year doesn't fit the money saving narrative.

    Ultimately, what I and the other commenter is saying is a once a year "need" really isn't a need at all. To further my example, if I lived in the snow or traveled there regularly, then AWD is likely a reasonable expense, but if very rarely used it would make more sense to rent/borrow. Same goes for a truck (for hauling), or gasoline car for the range.

    I drive an EV now and my next car will likely be an ICE AWD vehicle. But I'm also aware that it's not the most economically sound decision and I'd be buying it for fun. Under no circumstances would I be justifying it by the longer range (which I very seldom need) or to travel to the snow.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›