Might not be a bad thing if we can't breach low earth orbit for a few decades. Spoil some billionaire bugout plans and give us a chance to get our shit together before the race to mine everything kicks off.
post
If you wanted to launch a sattelite that would trigger Kessler Syndrome, how would you design it, what orbit would it take and where would you activate it?
Not sure about the altitude, but you’d probably want something that explodes into a bunch of shrapnel around other objects. I think the idea would be that the shrapnel starts to take its own orbit, smashing into its own things, destroying and creating even more shrapnel. Like a chain reaction.
Maybe a burst that maintains shrapnel in as high an orbit as possible that will decay slowly, maximizing the opportunity for collisions?
Yeah. It would need to be brittle so that it fragments, probably something that releases a lot of energy on impact. Maybe a quartz structure, if it could survive the temperatures?
If it explodes as an orb, you'll lose most of your material to space or the atmosphere. Probably want a shrapnel cone in line with the orbit, maybe angled a little spaceward so more material gets into higher orbit to eventually decay.
I think I Barliman Butterburred it: Start off at as low a trajectory as possible, and shoot the cone upward so the bulk of it reaches high orbit and starts to decay. That'll cross the most pathse. Bonus: Find out what the prevalent direction of sattelites is and try to go opposite to maximize delta v and passes-per-orbit.
Can you imagine a datacenter in space.... edong is a k hole crack head. He is such a dum dum
It's not exactly the wrong place to post something about Kessler syndrome, but it's obnoxious to post a video link instead of explaining the idea and/or linking to a written source.
Looking up Kessler syndrome online, the "2 days away" thing seems to mean that satellites have maneuvering thrusters to avoid collisions with each other. If a big enough solar flare knocked out all the collision avoidance stuff in the satellites, then within 2 days (3 days is what the other source said) there could potentially be enough collisions to trigger the syndrome.
Anyway people launching stuff are now at least aware of the issue and taking some kinds of precautions, maybe not enough.
The paper from December 10:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09643
There have been a handful of headlines in the last few months that have me a little more worried: the Shenzhou debris strike, Chinese satellite to Starlink 200 meter near miss, exploded/dead Starlink, and 4400 Starlinks lowering orbits.
And may not be
Topical:
https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-moves-thousands-starlink-satellites-orbit-near-miss-2026-1
So, between the slightly exploded Starlink and the near miss with a Chinese satellite that dove into the deep end without looking... They must actually be scared if they're lowering the orbits of 4400 satellites.
It's weird that I haven't seen this yet since I'm subbed on YT. It seems YT would rather shove AI slop in my face than show me things I'd actually like to watch.
all 12 comments