I got a banner warning today linking to this page. It was announced a while back, but I either didn't see it or forgot.

We have made the difficult decision to limit the use of LanguageTool’s browser extension to Premium users only. The rise of generative AI has made it more challenging to sustainably monetize our offering. A majority of users use our products for free, and the relatively small percentage of Premium subscribers is all that is subsidizing our continuously increasing server costs. To improve our Premium experience and to sustain our business model, we’ll be making the LanguageTool browser extension available exclusively for paying customers.

The key bit for people who can selfhost:

Yes. If you are a developer, you can still host and run your own instance of LanguageTool’s server. The browser extension will continue to work as it currently does for users who use it with their own server.

all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 49 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Unfortunately, the browser extension is proprietary. They used to have an open source one but they stopped maintaining it.

Proprietary was a dealbreaker for me. There is no way to verify that it isn't selling everything I type even if I do have it configured to point at a local server.

I'm also concerned that the extension may eventually no longer work against local servers as well.

https://github.com/languagetool-org/languagetool-browser-addon/issues/247

As an alternative, there is harper by wordpress: https://github.com/Automattic/harper

It is webassembly and runs entirely in your browser.

EDIT:

I will add that the rest of the languagetool ecosystem continues to work fine. Libreoffice now has a built in client, which you can point at your own hosted server. VSCode [1] also has their own languagetool extension. I use those and those work great. But in the browser I use harper nothing. I should probably install harper.

[1] Well, technically I use [code-oss]https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Visual_Studio_Code), which gets the extension from https://open-vsx.org/

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago

    From the accompanying FAQ:

    Are there any free alternatives Yes. Our sister brand, QuillBot, offers a free grammar-checking and paraphrasing browser extension that works just as well as LanguageTool for English, French, German, Spanish, Dutch, and Portuguese. Give it a try Quillbot

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    I would care if they haven't fucked people over and especially the open source community.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    You can self host the LT service as a docker container.

    https://github.com/languagetool-org/languagetool

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Does anyone have any notes on how to self host it and ideally some feedback on what it is to self-host it?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    YunoHost application is here: https://apps.yunohost.org/app/languagetool

    Docs for installing LanguageTool manually are here: https://dev.languagetool.org/http-server - version 20260528 works on Debian 13 under WSL, needs openjdk-25-jre-headless and the --public option. The extension settings have a localhost option, I didn't have to change anything else.

    Note that premium as of today costs $2.50 per month if you pay for two years in advance. Running LanguageTool on a laptop isn't very fast for languages other than English, so paying them for the cloud might provide a better experience than self-hosting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Thanks a lot! I’d explore that. I don’t know about others here, but I’m not even considering a non-self-hosted solution. But it’s great to know upfront that it would require a powerful server to have languages other than English.

  • source
  • parent
  • 21 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 16 points 11 months ago

    Their local model is also pretty nice

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    After reading this, I installed the local server and just routed the extension there. Took less than 20 min.

    My only concern is the desktop app has no server selection setting.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    Ooof. I think it's a pretty useful tool, but not worth anything close to what they're asking for a paid subscription.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago*

    People here don't seem to understand that this is only for the browser extension, you can still use the site directly...

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I guess they harvested enough user data by now and don't need to give it away for free anymore, well it had some uses but not enough for me to pay for

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    It's still FOSS, and you can either download it offline or selfhost the server if you want to use it without paying. Services cost money to run, I'm not going to ask for them to run that for free indefinitely 🤷

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago
    [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    I really wish there was one better than Gramerly and now this....

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago*

    Worth paying for. Honestly guys selhost for yourself and family contribute to project you depend on, and pay for everything else you don't have the time to do that too.

    Its free as in freedom, not free as in beer. Their still FOSS even so this isn't even a rug pull imho. The worst thing is it requires an account which hurts the privacy aspect of that. One the few times something like Meta mask actually makes sense... Maybe some way to get an token generated and sent for use rather than a blanket account

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Are there any alternatives besides the local model?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Tbh as long as the libreoffice extraction stays free then no problem imo.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Well, Since their alternative Quillbot does not support Firefox. I might switch to Grammarly

  • source