
"Now that is how you make a vegan shitpost"

"Now that is how you make a vegan shitpost"
"other females"
Will vegans ever learn that taking the moral high ground has never worked for converting anyone?
Fine dude, you're better human than me, congratulations. Call me when you start doing activisms against the carnic industry and not the people or leave me the fuck alone.
Vegans aren't better than you just because you make more harmful choices.
Nobody made you click this thread. You don't want to be left alone, you want people to stop talking about subjects you don't like.
The “carnic industry” is the people, the suppliers and the consumers. You think dismantling a factory farm alone is going to end meat consumption? You’d still be out there finding a way to indulge, so the problem has to be dealt with at its source. Now some people might complain that killing humans in defense of animals is morally wrong, but taking the moral high ground has never worked for converting anyone.
The “carnic industry” is the people, the suppliers...
Yes, exactly!
...and the consumers.
*Facepalm*
You think dismantling a factory farm alone is going to end meat consumption?
Literally yes? Though not just one, obviously. Also, the total end of meat consumption is stupid; reducing it is more feasible.
Now some people might complain that killing humans in defense of animals is morally wrong, but taking the moral high ground has never worked for converting anyone.
The hell are you talking about? Are you just saying stuff and using my words to look smart a cocky?
Suppliers meet a demand. Dismantle one, or all of them, and the demand will continue if the consumer’s attitude isn’t changed, it’ll just be a black market. There’s no formal crack industry but there’s still supply and demand. Blaming your meat eating on the existence of suppliers is one of the saddest blame shifts and lack of personal accountability statements I’ve ever read. Trying to convince me that if the industry was removed that humanity would accept it as the new norm is… unrealistic.
My abandoning of the moral high ground approach, which you suggested does not get people to change, is indeed a cocky spin on your words (I thought that was obvious) because you acknowledge it’s the moral high ground then demand to be left alone to indulge your derelict morality. If you concede moral superiority, prepare to be called out for your lower standards. Escalate with snark, get snark thrown back at you. Don't like it? Go find some echo chamber where you don’t have to have your values challenged.
But quick question, you said to go after the industry, not people, but then agreed when I said the industry is people. So who exactly am I supposed to be targeting?
It's really bizzare to me that the only takeaway most people are getting is "humans are inherently better than other animals by merit of being human, so any comparison you make to another animal is offensive" and not "maybe repeated forcible impregnation for someone's entire life so I can have an unnecessary food product is a fucked up thing to do". That's the bit that stands out the most I would think?
Humans aren't better in taste and texture tbh
Exactly. I would say veganism should be no "trendy" culture, but just an obvious consequence for treating animals the same like us, being also animals. But if people already get offended by food topics, there is no ground to advance that topic any further to ethics or so 😁
I'm not even a vegan BTW.
I swear the Vegan community has to be some kind of anti-vegan psyops.
"Bodily autonomy advocates are all hypocrites and cows are literally people" is such a tone deaf stance perfect for making only enemies.
Bodily autonomy advocates are all hypocrites
This meme is pointing out that some are hypocrites, but is by no means saying that all bodily autonomy advocates are all hypocrites. It is pointing out the hypocrisy of when a person advocates for the bodily autonomy of humans while not caring about the bodily autonomy of other animals.
cows are literally people
I cannot tell where you think that is being implied. You don't have to equate other animals to humans in order to care about them.
When you're working on your messaging, try to remember that
Humans are more important than animals.
Whether you believe it or not, it'll further your goals.
Humans are more important than other animals exactly in the same way your sibling is more important than a rando in another country.
The fact you'd pick your sibling before a stranger in a trolley problem doesn't mean you get to exploit, abuse, mistreat them or shoot them for a burger. Same goes for non-human animals.
Why are humans more important than animals?
If you listen to master zuckermuskfuckface, we're all expendable at the most urgently convenient time.
Because saying otherwise in your messaging is counterproductive. The people you reach through a social media meme aren't the ones who will respond to that in a way you want.
The "where do you draw the line" animals one is much better messaging.
Is your goal to influence people towards your cause or away from it?
Humans aren't more important than animals unless you strongly believe might makes right, which I'd hope you don't. Just because you can do something to other animals doesn't mean you should.
Good to see the whackadoodle stereotype being bucked so successfully. Just missing multiple exclamation marks after each sentence.
Using the word "carnist" in your post title must be one of the best indicator for idiotic takes. Thanks for self-reporting!
"other females" At least make better bait if you have to create strawmens to make people hate the vegan movement
top 37 comments