all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 5 months ago

How much money does an attack like this cost? So much money, effort, time for what? What does using these expensive missles accomplish?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Do we have the video of the missile actually striking? I'm looking and can't find it.

  • source
  • 11 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 33 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    It's 2026 and we're still falling for the propaganda move of calling ballistic missiles 'hypersonic', huh?

    I mean, don't get me wrong, they are flying at hypersoniic speed, but that is nothing special. The dangerous things are maneuverable (i.e. non-ballistic) hypersonic missiles. They are extremely hard to intercept, but also to make. Hence the propaganda, the Russians want to sound threatening, even though the rockets are not special at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    You’re right that hypersonic cruise missiles are probably a greater threat and maybe there is a propaganda side to this, but the Oreshnik is no slouch and not particularly easy to intercept. Yes it is ballistic, but it carries MIRV’s which are notoriously challenging. Not arguing at all, just explaining that these are a substantial threat too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    So since Nov '24 - 1½ years - they used it thrice? Obviously they don't have too many of those.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    Must have cost a fortune. Is this really a sign that Putin is getting really nervous that he spends so much that he can’t afford?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Putin is desperate. He will likely get a massive drone response.

  • source