all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 6 months ago

It's a huge market, selling hate. Next they should start a podcast and sell vitamin supplements.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Didn't the British do a similar thing to Pakistan a hundred years ago?

  • source
  • 20 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 18 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I'm not sure "devout" is the right adjective. Maybe tack on "self-described" or "incredibly ignorant."

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Definitely self-described at most.

    He runs other accounts dedicated to sharing Quran verses and Islamic teachings. One features the Kaaba holy site in Mecca as its profile picture. He uses the title “Hafiz” before his name, an honorific reserved for those who have memorised the entire Quran.

    That's a testable assertion that was untested, so using that name for one account while spreading hate on another makes me very disinclined to think "oh these are his real beliefs."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 37 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    The religious will never let their religion get in the way when it comes to filling their own pockets.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    Surah 104. Al-Humazah

    Woe to every slanderer backbiter.

    Who gathers wealth and counts it over.

    Thinking that his wealth has made him immortal.

    By no means. He will be thrown into the Crusher.

    I know it's basically impossible to say someone isn't in a religion (much to the chagrin of many a devout and reasonable religious person), but this surah is so specifically against this guy in particular.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -23 points 6 months ago* (6 children)

    I'm sorry, explain to me how making money by fooling bigoted assholes is anything except funny as hell? Unethical, sure, but I respect the hustle.

    It sounds like you're mad cause you could have fallen for it, given your apparent /r/atheism attitude you're displaying here.

    Also, it does sound like he didn't know what was going on with the videos. The onus is still on the bigoted dipshits who gave him an audience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    He's not a bystander though, he is encouraging racist ideas and thoughts. I see spreading hate as a bad thing, and the fact that Alex Jones or this guy got rich off it makes me actually more angry, not impressed by his hustle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    he is encouraging racist ideas and thoughts

    Islam isn't a race

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago

    Because it feeds the hatred, purely for money. There is nothing even remotely funny about it. We know the followers of right wing ideologies, be they British white fascists or Pakistani Islamists are stupid and easily fooled, but also potentially violent, and a lot of innocent people are likely to get hurt from them, in part because of the stupid propaganda hate they have consumed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    He understands it just fine.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Kind of interesting to see this happening in the UK as well. Similar to all of the Russian bots on Facebook targeting the US.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago
    [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    So Meta has been pulling this algorithm tactic for years, especially with teens, but now you're mad about a small part of the problem? Well, I suppose it is a step, I admit. I just don't get it, why don't we all just leave Meta?

  • source
  • Once again Western media reminds me the West doesn't understand belief/religion. It's one or the other. 🤷

  • source
  • 9 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I was thinking about this last year as America is being clowned by out-of-state actors and why it happens:

    If you paid somebody in the US to shit-talk the Yellow team in say (and I'm picking a country at random) Romania, and promote the Blue team instead... They'd probably do it. Even if it's something insignificant like $50 a week. The US person has zero interest in the politics of Romania.

    Fire off a few tweets like "Yellow team again failing people." Or "Blue team, true patriots", upvote some diversive shit, repost some memes, and easy money.

    This is happening every day for cheap.

    Mix in some AI bots, and for a few thousand dollars, you recreated Twitter's racist/hate shit that controls the narrative.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    I don't think that's helpful. You can tune it out because you have the privilege to do so.

    While your neighbors and friends who are feeling the pressure of all of this. My family is colored. No amount of tuning it out is going to stop a ICE agent from entering a restaurant and demanding identification.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago

    Staying over there, talking the jobs of hard working right wing influences.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Emily Darlington, a Labour MP who sits on the Science, Innovation and Technology select committee, said: “There’s clearly a market for hate content in the UK. When social media, intended to connect us, instead feeds us an endless stream of divisive and anger-fuelling content it distorts not only how we feel about our neighbours, but how we think the nation feels about our neighbours.

    “The fact that this tactic is successful enough with a UK audience that individuals in other countries can profit off it shows how vulnerable we are. There’s nothing stopping foreign states from doing the same.”

    Maybe the best way to counter xenophobia isn't to rely on anti-immigrant views not being expressed


    a fragile convention that can easily fall apart


    but to actively explain why immigration is advantageous.

    If people do not understand the purpose of a policy, they will try to make sense of it, either on their own or via adopting the takes that seem most-plausible to them.

    If one's way of dealing with politicially-unpopular policy is to hope that it doesn't come up and thus falls out of public discussion rather than to sell the public on it...shrugs

    Democracy is intended to have the public act as final, ultimate overseers of policy. At the end of the day, one has to sell the public on major policy decisions or be at risk of the public acting in opposition to that policy.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    A lot of British Pakistanis like to holiday in Pakistan, and I mean, a lot, and like any sufficiently large group of humans, there's bound to be a handful who bear a grudge.

    Which is to say that If I hear that something terrible has happened to him, I won't be in the least bit surprised.

    (Which is NOT to endorse someone doing anything like that. This is merely an observation.)

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    This AI slop churning nets $18k/yr and puts him into the top ten percent of earners in Pakistan, he can probably afford private security there since that’s crazy cheap what with the massive poverty. Even if he were to have something terrible happen to him the money at stake would likely see someone else step right up to replace him in that sort of scheme.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    There's more than one person doing this. It's organized.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago*

    India blocked Pakistan creators from appearing in India. It is helpful since pakistanis were also like, pretending to be local police and causing phone scams.

    And also a lot of hatred vitriol towards each other. In comments.

    Blocking a country like Pakistan would be a great way to prevent hate and scam on social.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk view that post
    [–] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    The situation, where earnings are based on incitement to hatred and manipulation, directly contradicts Islamic moral norms. The use of technology to create harmful content is a violation of ethical principles that require honesty and piety from a believer in all matters.

    To understand why such methods of enrichment are unacceptable, it is worth Learn about what is forbidden in Islam at IslamBase101 https://islambase101.com/forbidden-in-islam/ Observance of religious ethics in the digital space is an important aspect of modern human life.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    The title says it is a devout Muslim man but nothing in the article seems to confirm it. Not even that he is a Muslim. Just that he claims to only speak Urdu which is an obvious lie.

    Weird article.

  • source