all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 27 points 6 months ago

"Dystopian" is a great word for this.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I used to be north of Chicago for work once or twice a year. The hotel was right next to the office, so I could walk there. But that was the only place I could walk. I wanted to walk to the mall, as it was only 2km or so. But it was impossible. There was only a four lane road, no sidewalks. I also had to go to Princeton and it was better there, as the hotel was right next to a residential area and there were sidewalks there. But man, the US are incredibly car-centric.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    Usually the hotels have shuttles to the entertainment district. But it gets tricky over there with the airport being a "peninsula" of city territory. I'm not old enough to remember the origin, but I remember many neighborhoods being leveled to expand the airport (we would party in the vacant houses with electricity til the cops noticed). My guess is that was not the original setup and with the neighborhoods going away, the need for pedestrian bridges went away with them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    Nope, can't imagine living next to a motorway. Or choosing to go to a restaurant tbh.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Why can’t he just walk across the street? There isn’t so much traffic that he’d be playing frogger so i don’t see the issue.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    An able bodied man, sure. What about an old lady? Or a ten year old? Five lanes of 50mph traffic. That won’t work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    This.

    Also, even as an able-bodied man, I’m happy to jaywalk across residential streets and small roads. But a busy road or motorway? I’m not risking my life for that. Let alone multiple lanes! I always walk the 100m or so to the nearest pedestrian crossing… which is exactly what this guy should be able to do.

    It’s just bad design, and I strongly disagree with the idea of “it doesn’t look that bad, just cross”. You shouldn’t even have to assess risk like that.

    I’m not exactly enamoured with the UK, but its walkability (at least in suburbs and cities) is something I am so thankful for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    I checked with Google Maps. To get to the exact opposite side of where the video is shot using the nearest crosswalk would be 725 meters.

    Or just over a kilometer if you didn’t judge it correctly and went the other way.

    79 feet (25 meters) if you’re willing to take your chances crossing the road. Most people are going to jaywalk, which just needlessly puts lives at risk.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -27 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    Why is it uncrossable? Traffic doesn't drive too fast. Maybe its a bit busy and a bit wide for comfort, but crossable nontheless. Regardless, it's stupid they don't at least put a zebra crossing in.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I bet he's too young to know what Frogger is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)