• Red meat is a nutrient dense food providing important amounts of protein, essential amino acids, vitamins, and minerals that are the most common nutrient shortages in the world, including vitamin A, iron, and zinc.
  • Despite claims by the World Health Organization (WHO) that eating processed meat causes colon cancer and red meat probably causes cancer, the observational data used to support the claims are weak, confounded by multiple unmeasured factors, and not supported by other types of research needed for such a conclusion. Although intervention studies are designed to test the validity of associations found in observational studies, two interventions of low-fat, low-meat diets in volunteers that failed to find a benefit on cancer were not considered in the WHO decision.
  • It is likely that the association of red-meat consumption with colon cancer is explained either by an inability of epidemiology to detect such a small risk or by combinations of other factors such as greater overweight, less exercise, lower vegetable or dietary fiber intake, and perhaps other habits that differentiate those who eat the most meat from those who eat the least.

Full Paper - https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfy009

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 2 points 5 months ago

Dr Klurfeld also gave a very interesting interview on this same topic, getting into more of the IARC details - https://discuss.online/post/25102657

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    It's funny that the "obviously not causal" example is margarine consumption (USA) vs divorce rate (Maine), though I can see a possible casual reason

    "Carnivore cool" has to be related to having excellent quality of nutrition

    More margarine is related to the demonization of animal fat, those with higher margarine probably have lower quality nutrition thus more stress, which could easily increase the divorce rate.

    I wonder what the divorce rate in carnivore couples is compared to vegetarian couples

  • source