all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 20 points 6 months ago (1 child)

It's a sad state of affairs, but if you limit the date range of searches to pre-2022 you get much better results. Like this: https://noai.duckduckgo.com/?q=stuff&noai=1&df=2000-02-02..2022-11-30

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 6 months ago

    I'm da content now

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    Panel 3 and 4 aren't quite right.

    The guy in Panel 3 didn't just remix it, he cherry picked the parts that would be most likely to rank for either a short or long tail keyword strategy depending on the size and business of his client or employer.

    And that guy doesn't have his paper taken away in Panel 4. He's feeding as many papers as he can to the AI which are tailored for "Answer Engine Optimization" or "Generative Engine Optimization" (they haven't settled on a catchy name yet for what is largely the same thing, even if some claim they're different).

    The techniques have changed slightly but SEO has been a filthy game for much longer than AI. Google made sure of that with their auction house, "featured snippet" sections and backlink authority ranking systems.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Shouldn't the AI set at least one paper on fire?

  • source
  • [+] -52 points 6 months ago (17 children)

    I'm pretty sure the people complaining loudest about AI slop are the ones who have been producing human slop for years.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Nah, the producers of human slop are ecstatic because now they can just prompt up their slop and post something for engagement, before they had to at least put in a modicum of effort to make their slop. It would take at least as long to make the human slop as a human would take to view it, now they can get output with even less than the effort the human wastes seeing it.

    The slop flood gates are open.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    Time was you'd need to stand in front of a green screen and point your actual human finger in the air, then overlay that video in OBS over whatever content you wanted to steal.

    Slop-jockeys these days dont know how easy they have it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    The point is AI stole everyone’s work - without credit and without paying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments