top 77 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

if yeah want an amazing dinosaur park media, check out Dinosaur Sanctuary.

they treat the dinosaurs as animals, and the whole plot revolves around the upkeep of the zoo.

it was cowritten by a paleontologist and a manga artist.

that manga speaks to my soul as I worked in a zoo when I was 18 to 21. it really hits my nostalgia,

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I saw the new one with my father in law today, after not having seen one since the original trilogy. It was just not good. I'm usually able to turn off my brain and enjoy a movie regardless of the quality, but there were so many things that didn't make sense, or were glossed over without explanation, that I just couldn't suspend my disbelief.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I’m sorry, new one? You mean from like 2019 right?

    Right‽

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    The premise of dinosaurs in the modern world is as close to evergreen as you can get. The problem isn't that the cow has gone dry, so much as the farmers keep jerking off the bull instead.

  • source
  • [–] 79 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    There is a shifting of themes that basically tracks with the corporate takeover of the US government.

    1. (1993) Companies fucking around with systems they don't understand is the problem. Rich guy underestimates nature.
    2. (1997) Rich guy learned lesson. Corporate greed did not.
    3. (2001) post-dotcom crash: A rich fucker and his stupid family learn the lesson about the company that fucked with nature. Governments are bad for not interveneing.
    4. (2015) post-Birther: Company and its rich founder are naive and innocent. US Government and US education are the bad guys.
    5. (2018) Corporate suits are the good guys. Science is the bad guys.
    6. (2022) A (suddenly) European company is the bad guys. Science is again the bad guy. Americans are the good guys.
    7. (2025) The US company and Military are the good guys.
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago*

    Did you actually see the 2025 movie? No way the theme you got from that is US Corpo good. If anything g it's literally the opposite.

    I didn't see anything else than 2025. Pretty bad.

    But...(spoiler)But the main character literally decides to open-source the data instead of selling it to a pharma corp.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I do agree with the main point of your post; however, I feel that your reasoning is backwards.

    Big blockbusters give the masses a dose of placebo. You see a movie where people who hold your values win, so you feel like it happened in real life, so you're less likely to make it happen in real life.

    So I'm not spoiling this movie, look at the MCU instead: They defeated Thanos and stopped half the world's population from disappearing, and then we failed to properly fight COVID and Donald Trump gained power.

    Now, I know correlation doesn't equal causation, and that there were other factors at play, but I also know that when you perceive the image of something, it activates the same neurons as actually seeing that thing - when you watch The Notebook or Armageddon, you feel the emotions of the characters in the film, and you cry.

    That, combined with the other psychological tactics that we are constantly being bombarded with, make it difficult for us to navigate the world with a clear head. When you feel like you're winning, why would you fight?

    And also, a TON of people are straight apathetic, and a lot more are just plain-old stupid. And there are dozens or hundreds of other factors such as personality of the audience, socioeconomics, religious beliefs, etc... that come into play here as well. It's not quite as cut-and-dry as "monkey see, monkey feels as though it has done," but that does play a large factor in it.

    I typed all this but didn't proofread any of it, so I hope it makes sense. I'm sleepy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    I think people at different levels of media literacy read/watch stories differently.

    I think people with different politics maybe do too; im an anarchist, at best an incoherent and extremely skip-that-part version of what i believe gets spouted by the villain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The Jurassic Park movie franchise is the best representation of movies that diminish with each movie since the first one.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    First one was grand, didn't need to be followed up or remade. Now we have a franchise.. The only remake I wouldn't mind seeing is a more brutal first one, closer to what the book was depicting. All I'd be interested in really.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Both this and Five Nights at Freddy’s have an interesting problem, where they’re based around an entertainment franchise that goes wrong - but the franchise itself necessitates repeated attempts and failure.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The modern film industry in one imagine.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I’m looking forward to Jurassic Park 9: The Secrets of Dumbledore

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I saw the first Jurassic Park. I enjoyed it. But I feel sated with that single entry. If you love these movies, more power to you, but I don't really understand it myself.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The books, Jurassic Park and its sequel The Lost World, are very good and very different from the movies. I also recommend Disclosure by the same author.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    In general I feel like I'm more likely to want to revisit and spend more time in the world of a good book than the world of most films, even films I enjoy, so it makes sense to me that there's enough to easily fill two books worth.

  • source
  • parent
  • I saw the first one, enjoyed it...not sure I could explain the plot or what happened in it. At the time having the dinosaurs brought to life was spectacle enough; they could have made a movie about the park working correctly and it would have sold tickets.

    I watched the second and third one back to back with a girl. They were alright. I don't care to see them again. I'm not watching any more of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Eh, if Michael Chrichton were still alive today he'd probably condone it all so long as he got his royalty check. Jurassic Park canon was never holy.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Hey, corporation needed to look 'good' so it was obvious they would scrap the shitty CEO of the Book and put 'Santa Claus' in his place, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    Genuinely flabbergasted people financially support, and thus incentivise this garbage.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    I saw it and it wasn't as bad as some of the other but not great. The big bad dies in like a single second with zero build up and its really unsatisfying. Weird character choices, unnecessary and forgetable characters mostly. The nerd guy "Harry" was the best actor for me. 6/10 not worth re-watching or thinking about again

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    6/10 is a very high score considering that review.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (7 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    65/100 is a D. Anything lower is an F.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I saw the movie on the weekend and I liked it. Much better than the last two, but obviously not as good as the first one.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)

    Next week: Jurassic Petting Zoo!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I was ok with the first Chris Pratt one. Not great, not awful.

    What I really wish they had done was set the next one a couple years down the line. Maybe a couple of those military helicopters that are stealing the dinosaurs at the end crashes in mainland South/Central America. Imagine a Jurassic Park movie that's a cross between Alien/Predator/Planet of the Apes. Really lean into the highly intelligent apex predator and horror angle.

    The problem with these movies, is they keep letting the cat out of the bag, over and over and over. Cat's out. What's next?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago

    I think they tried to do that with the new one. The D Rex (are we still adding rex where it doesn't belong?) was clearly modelled after the xenomorph.

    I wanna be clear they failed. I haven't been this disappointed in a movie since I saw TLJ for the first time

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I need a picture of Universal milking a T-Rex.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Wtf was the point of this entire film? Like why?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I saw the latest fuckrassic park a couple days ago. It was at best… okay. Not worth what the movie theater charges. But if you wait to stream it then it isn’t terrible. But overall, this franchise has lost its luster

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    That’s the big issue with going to the theatre. Two tickets, popcorn and a drink for my wife and I and I’m paying $50+ in Canada. I think the last movie we saw in theatres was dr strange 2 and it wasn’t worth it, before that it was avengers end game. 99% of movies just aren’t worth going to the movies for. I haven’t seen a film i would say was 100% worth it since Fury Road. Everything else im fine watching at home. Better resolution, i have a good screen and sound. And I can pause to go take a piss

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Yeah we have similar prices (US). The tickets were $27 (for my wife and myself) and $7 for a coke. If we get popcorn and snacks its just about $50+, depending on what we get. We get snacks beforehand and just hide them in my wifes purse like most people. I used to love going to the movies for the whole experience. But it just keeps getting more expensive and as of late, no good movies are coming out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Happy july-sixth park

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Challenge: Let's broaden the Jurassic world. How do you make a Jurassic movie without the dinosaurs breaking loose?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    The dinos are back, but of some species, every generation is smarter than the last, until they actually start speaking. Because they had a super civilisation, and their scientists encoded the key to rebuilding their civilisation in the DNA we found. The next generation becomes smart enough to invent a time machine, and try to manipulate us into going back in time to prevent the comet strike that took them out. Joke's on them - they were in fact aware of the comet strike, but as we travel back in time together, the human part of the crew sabotage their Armageddon mission and make sure the strike actually happens, to pave the way for mammal domination!

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I swear Universal said Jurassic World: Dominion would be the last movie for the franchise, then two years later they announced Rebirth.

  • source