all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 6 months ago

Another boring dystopia:

Image of the forbes website having a prediction market part.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    How many listens pushing this to the top are just curiousity of people listening to the 'AI song'.

    I just struggle to care about this as an achievement, it's pure novelty.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago

    "There's no accounting for taste."

  • source
  • From "1984":

    "There was a whole chain of separate departments dealing with proletarian literature, music, drama, and entertainment generally. Here were produced rubbishy newspapers containing almost nothing except sport, crime, and astrology, sensational five-cent novelettes, films oozing with sex, and sentimental songs which were composed entirely by mechanical means on a special kind of kaleidoscope known as a versificator."

    Honestly, the difference between what we have today and what we had 10-15 years ago (uninspired, repetitive and boring melodies, and lyrics written by 65+ yo Norwegian men to be sung by and marketed to teenage girls) is not that large.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    The number one of anything is usually too stupid to notice.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Shows how formulaic pop songs are.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 6 comments in c/music@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 7 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    “Celebrate Me,” released by an AI-generated persona IngaRose, currently sits atop the iTunes charts in the United States, United Kingdom, France, Canada and New Zealand.

    Five of the top 100 songs on U.S. iTunes as of Friday afternoon are by IngaRose

    This just doesn’t seem to be true (anymore anyway). I didn’t see the name a single time scrolling through the Top 100: USA chart. The chart is updated daily; I suppose it’s possible there was manual intervention since Friday?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Different chart. iTunes and AM top 100 are different. The iTunes Charts are for song sales past day and the barrier for top 100 or even 10 is incredibly low since everyone streams or buys physical now rather than individual songs on iTunes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Thanks for clarifying

    ETA: not #1 anymore but this definitely seems like a more believable one day change. Probably cheaper to buy your way into the top of a chart than actually produce a hit

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Also, "Five of the top 100 songs on U.S. iTunes as of Friday afternoon are by IngaRose" certainly sounds like chart manipulation.

    That could be another reason for manual removal. But mission accomplished for the AI slopper either way, since they got their free advertising.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    Just tells me iTunes' charts are easily manipulated & not worth using as a metric for popularity.

  • source