WHERES JA?!

I haven't used an LLM, but it's probably similar to how people could not Google for shit. I always considered myself something of an expert at using search engines, although they've gone to shit obviously, and with the advent of AI it seems like they will fade out.

"Properly prompting" is to not prompt. A chat interface is the lowest fidelity interface to use with an LLM.

I don't know, it seems to me that most people know how to ask a question or make a request. It's not that different. It's just that a lot of people don't understand what is possible and they freeze.

You tell them, to ask for anything you want. They uncork and say "So I can ask it for a chocolate cream pie?". Partially in jest, but they do that because they don't seem to have a comfortable knowledge of the limits. A person with little technical background has no need for output that they don't understand. Once you guide them a little and let them know they can get a recipe for a chocolate cream pie and some practical advice on how to make it, that might be helpful, but little better than just looking up a recipe. You'd have to let them know that they can find multiple variants of recipes and have it rank them, compare them, and produce a summary of the most popular types. By now they've stopped listening and have gone to the grocery store to buy a chocolate cream pie and you're standing there hoping they will give you a piece.

In summary, I wish I had some pie. What was the question?

Ez pz. "Interpret this prompt in the proper manner"

That is also what it looked like back in 2022 when she partnered with World of Women to release NFT's.

“While the crypto and NFT space is largely dominated by men, there are inspiring leaders like World of Women creating incredible communities for women during this massive shift for media and technology,”

https://variety.com/2022/film/news/reese-witherspoon-hello-sunshine-world-of-women-partner-nft-movies-tv-shows-live-events-1235185212/

She might have enough money to be privately invested. If not directly, through a hedge fund or rich pals.

Isn’t she famous for being an early actor who became an investor, like Like the Punk’d/70s show guy.

Ignoring everything else, "washed up" only means someone has lost their previous high status. It has nothing to do with age. You can be a washed up child actor.

I mean, you said yourself she's working on TV. It's definitely a step down from the height of her career, and it looks like I've never even heard of her most recent show. Pacino is definitely in washed up territory, I haven't heard anything about him since Jack and Jill or maybe that weird de-aged Netflix movie. Cranston is different in that he's primarily a TV actor whose work has only become more respected over his career, although apart from the Malcolm reboot I haven't heard much from him, so perhaps he is in the process of becoming washed. It's all a relative thing and I don't think misogyny played as much of a role in this comment as you're arguing.

EDIT: Reworded my last sentence because misogyny is definitely a huge problem in Hollywood, I just didn't appreciate you jumping down comment OP's throat.

When a woman says something they get judged much harsher. Plenty of research about this. People just want to judge women. The day has structure when there’s a scapegoat. Her point is still valid. Do your research before talking people. Please. I beg of you.

hilarious. JFC..The Morning Show?

She's washed up and investing in AI, while simultaneously insulting women with real jobs by telling them their jobs are bullshit.