Nobody asked for this
post
This logo reminds me of Nullsoft Winamp
God dammit. All the whining they do about needing donations to keep developing and this is what they come up with.
Sounds like this is in the same space as OpenWebUI? It would be good to have some more choice there.
It sounds like a step further than open-webui; it’s an enterprise grade client-server model for access to agents, workflows, and centralized knowledge repositories for RAG.
In addition to local chatbot for executive/admin use, I can see this being the backend for developers running Cursor or some other AI enhanced IDE, with local knowledge stores holding proprietary documents and running against local large models.
I am also curious about time share and prioritization of resources; I assume it would queue simultaneous requests. Presumably this would let you more effectively pool local compute, rather than providing A100 GPUs to each developer that may sit unused when they’re not working.
Edit: Somewhat impressively, this whole stack does not even include a local inference provider; so it does everything except local models right now, and requests are forwarded to cloud inference providers (Anthropic, OpenAI, etc). But it does have the backend started for rate limiting and queuing, and true “fully offline/local” is on the roadmap, just not there yet.
After reading through the GitHub docs, the most impressive thing is that they open sourced their Thunderbolt coding agent for Claude Code. There are quite a few skills available for implementation planning, dependency/build environment setup, coding, linting/cleanup, QA, and managing agent pull requests. Pretty good examples if you are looking at building Claude Code skills.
Where are you seeing that it's useable for RAG? I've gone through the github and not seeing anyting very specific that way.
Edit: good lord their documentation is shit. Spend a few tokens on a proper mkdocs site or something.
At last a useful comment thread about the actual functionality in question.
While I am not moving back to reddit, Threadiverse is just terrible on any nuanced conversations on modern ML tools and approaches.
The tech is not the issue here. It has legitimate use cases and it is here to stay (this is not a blockchain pump and dump scheme ala Web 3.0). The issue here are American tech companies and broader support for crime/corruption in US society (as of today, doesn't mean that this can't/won't change in 20-30 years). We need truly independent open source systems and tools.
I am aware OpenWebUI is based in San Francisco and Mozilla Foundation is based in the US. I am always on the lookout for alternatives.
It looks like it, it doesn't seem to be doing any self-referencing/agentic things out of the box so the end user would need to build a bit to cover their specific use cases.
They seem to be aiming more at the startup/small company demographic than at self-hosters. This is just based on a skim of the repo and their product page, I haven't looked at it too hard yet.


Well guys... It's endorsed by the CEO.
so there's that
Omg take my money!! 💸💸💸💸
Seriously loosing whatever faith i had left in Mozilla... I want to love them so badly, but this just hurts.
Oh no, they wrote a free program that you don't want to use.
They have the audacity of doing things, that is despicable and definitely reprehensible.
I see your account is just here to troll/harass people who don't love AI too, but we're witnessing Mozilla burning goodwill and capital for no apparent reason.
Please don't tell people to stick their heads in the sand.
Advocacy against Mozilla's waste has already gotten them nervous and defensive, and that advocacy can and should continue.
Really, you're going to follow me around calling me a troll? That's sadder than being a troll.
Nah, what's sadder is getting ratioed like this for being an AI shill.
You care about Karma points? On the Fediverse, even?
I care about the sentiment, not the points.
Okay, so you only want to say things that are popular within a community, and you consider people who say things that are unpopular to be "trolls" that should be excluded from that community.
This is what makes social media into self-reinforcing information bubbles and leads people to be out of touch with the general public. Like this Thunderbolt tool - if "nobody asked for this", as another commenter in this thread said, why do you think it was made? There's actually a lot of demand for AI tools in the real world but communities like this one create narratives that convinced themselves that it's all some kind of delusional grift with unclear motives. When someone like me comes along that challenges that narrative, ooh, troll. Downvote and drive out! And you wonder why everyone left seems to agree?
You should really just block me if you don't want to hear my views. I suppose you could report me to the mods if you think I've actually broken any rules, but that normally requires a bit more backing it up than just disagreeing with my opinion or thinking it's unpopular. Otherwise you're just going to waste your time and make yourself unhappy.
Facedeer, if you don't want people to see you as a troll, don't complain about "apocalyptic" rhetoric around AI job loss one day, then say people are in "denial" if they don't believe it the next day.
In other words, don't be a troll.
In other words, "don't have an opinion about AI that's different from mine."
Facedeer, posting two contradictory things is not "having an opinon." It is trolling.
You should try having an opinion, and even sticking to the topic (addressing Mozilla's waste instead of bloviating about some vague virtue of the right to speech ). It would be so much more interesting.
What's contradictory? A lot of people in that thread about AI capabilities were in denial. A lot of other people are making apocalyptic statements.
See that "other people" thing? Different people have different opinions and react differently. That's the point I'm making here, too. Not everyone hates this AI tool that Mozilla has put out.
FaceDeer, don't act dumb. You clearly went into both threads to attack and name-call anybody who doesn't criticize AI under your ill-defined, ever-shifting standards. So your attacks ended up contradictory and hypocritical.
And now you're here to defend Mozilla waste by suggesting there are people who totally wanted it. (Are they in the room with you right now?)
And now you're here to defend Mozilla waste by suggesting there are people who totally wanted it. (Are they in the room with you right now?)
FauxLiving, harmburgler, Avid Amoeba, and CyberSeeker are discussing it in positive terms elsewhere in this very thread. 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘 had a more cautiously open view. So yes, they are in the "room" with us right now.
Since you care about upvotes, note that many of my comments here have garnered a decent number of those too.
You ignored the first half of my statement. Noted.
To the second half: show me where they asked Mozilla to spend money on it before Mozilla did. Otherwise you misinterpreted what I wrote.
I ignored the first half of your statement because it was just pointless badmouthing of me.
I'm ignoring the rest of your comment because it's a weird goalpost shift. Why would Mozilla ask a bunch of random people on the Fediverse what they want? You're upset because they didn't personally ask you what to do?
This is what makes social media into self-reinforcing information bubbles and leads people to be out of touch with the general public.
There’s actually a lot of demand for AI tools in the real world but communities like this one create narratives that convinced themselves that it’s all some kind of delusional grift with unclear motives.
100%
It's one thing to be against the rampant capitalist orgy around AI that's disrupting markets and driving up energy costs. I agree with that sentiment. I also agree that there are questions around copyright and said capitalists have stolen a lot of work from people.
That being said, it's complete nonsense to take that gripe and then pretend that every possible use of Transformer-based neural networks is evil and useless.
Yes, there are aspects of the creation of commercial Large Language Models and Diffusion Models that are immoral and should be criticized, but if somebody's kneejerk reaction is to hate everything that says 'AI' then they're no different than the anti-vaxxers or election deniers or any other people who let social media do their thinking for them.
People are upset at all of the datacenters being created and also are upset when there are self-hosting tools being created, where's the logic in that? What is the actual position held by you people other than: 'see AI, downvote'?
Ratio doesn't mean right. This is so obvious, that you (@call_me_xale@lemmy.zip) should feel shame that you even made that comment.
I know you wont, though, you must be right because look at the RATIO! That's how you know how right you are, correct? After all, there is no need to actually make any kind of rational argument or attempt to participate in the discussion in any meaningful way, just find the right clapback and watch the ratio.
The same with the conspiratorial personal attack. They don't share your opinion so they're a secret plant by the AI industry? Really? Conspiratorial and paranoid delusions are not a substitute for a rational opinion, no matter what the ratio says or how self-righteous you feel when you press the submit button.
I look forward to your response. If I could make a suggestion, perhaps try insinuating that @FaceDeer@fedia.io and I are the same person on alt accounts, that one always gets good ratio. Maybe a single emoji reply, the effort:ratio ratio on that one is pretty good. I have a pretty considerable comment history, maybe you can find something in there. Though you could also go with not replying, I mean after all this is wayyyy down the comment chain so you may not find the attention that you're seeking.
Put some effort into your snark and show a little originality. Repeating the "L ratio" meme is tired af.
You use an LLM to write this?
0/10
At least @XLE@piefed.social put some effort into it.
FauxLiving, being another AI advocate who's just here to troll and spread snark doesn't make you special.
Nor does pretending you have a special opinion while not only failing to provide it, but instead attacking people who disagree with you. But with flair. Here's a tip: address what's discussed, instead of bloviating about diversity of thought or making baseless accusations towards people who disagree with you.
My dude, while I appreciate the 'just a tip' angle of your snark, I have been arguing with people on the Internet longer than you have been breathing, so just let me cook and enjoy the ride.
A guy, who has no ability to program, announcing a fork of a major project deserves to be mocked. If you read that as advocating AI, then that's certainly a decision and I applaud your bravery in standing up for idiots.
e: oh no my ratio
AND all caps “trusted by organisations that don’t compromise”
TBH that sounds like a warning.
Thunderbird team unveils... 🙂 thunderbolt... 😃self-hostable... 🤯AI😒client 😓
Idk why they tied it to the Thunderbird name but cool I guess
literally all they had to do was maintain the good old status quo and everyone would have loved them for it
I don't think their market share/relevance would start rising if they just maintained the status quo.
Which isn't to say this direction is great or the way to go about it, but they can't do nothing either.
Does this have anything to do with Thunderbird? I'm confused.
I want to be able to login to my m365 work account without Owl (but I do love you for filling the gap Owl). Why weren't these resources spent on making that a reality? Thats twenty times more useful for Thunderbird and its users.
Supposedly, this is a new and different team that will be taking a grant from the Mozilla Foundation. (I have no idea where these new resources came from, but in the best case scenario, they will appear out of thin air and not slow down work on Thunderbird...)
I can get behind this concept for those that want email summaries, I suppose. But absolutely not from a donation run nonprofit who was told time and again that we do not want ai shoved in every orifice.
Edit. Autocorrect
However an AI by a nonprofit is the only kind of AI I would potentially use.
I'm not against the LLM tech, it's that by using it I would support the shittiest of megacorps that use their power for evil (from training data to direct politics, and let's not forget markets disruptions).
AI by a for-profit has guaranteed enshitification built into the business model, otherwise they wouldn't get any capital.
Could you explain what email summaries have to do with this announcement? Thunderbird and Thunderbolt are separate applications. Thunderbolt doesn't include AI models, it is merely a frontend to an AI API of choice, similar to how Thunderbird is a frontend to an email server of choice.
And this is yet another reason why I use Betterbird.
Because of a separate app that doesn't affect Thunderbird in day to day use? What?
Because it is a pure, forked version attempting the evoke the intent of the original project.
So like, another open source competitor to LM Studio and OpenWebUI? Roadmap lists Ollama support. Honestly, this is pretty cool. I'm not sure what all the whinging in this thread is about. Are y'all mad because it's AI related? This is specifically a tool for you to use AI without needing to pay the data centers or the proprietary enterprise AI companies... Self hosting an LLM is exactly what we should be doing with it.
Prepare to be sued by Apple? I know one is LLM and the other is an interface standard. Not a great choice of a name I may say.

top 77 comments