I am tired boss...

top 77 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 135 points 6 months ago (15 children)
  • [–] [S] 68 points 6 months ago (13 children)

    Indeed... As far as I know at least the Thunderbird donations are not going towards this, its Mozilla funded. I just cannot see that anyone asked or needed this, such a waste of time that should have gonw towards Thunderbird.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    If anybody needs to know: this is why you should not not donate to the Mozilla Foundation. No money goes towards Firefox or Thunderbird through it!

    The products I care about:

    • Firefox is funded by Google
    • Thunderbird is funded by donations

    The groups I don't:

    • "Thunderbolt is funded through a dedicated investment from Mozilla",
    • ...and Mozilla is funded by separate donations too.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 23 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Keep in mind that that there is a strong likelihood that XLE is a demagogue and is dedicated to shitting up any mozilla/Firefox/TB thread with lies and gross exaggerations that function as lies. XLE almost certainly does not use Firefox or Thunderbird (it wouldn't make sense considering their posting history).

    XLE claimed that "Firefox is bursting at the seams with ads." This is clearly not true.

    As an example they cited "sponsored search suggestions", which to my mind isn't a big deal and can easily be disabled. For the sake of transparency, I will note that I've never got them and it seems I can't enable them even if I wanted to (likely due to my region?)

    XLE also claimed that the on-hover sponsorship notice for the Firefox weather widget as an example of "Firefox bursting at the seam with ads." I haven't used the default new tab page in a decade plus, so maybe this impacts how I see things. From my perspective, an on-hover sponsorship notice for optional widgets is a misleading example for their claims.

    You can make up your own mind and read our conversation here: https://piefed.social/comment/10831188

    P.S. I am not saying you shouldn't cancel your donation. I've donated to Mozilla Foundation before and cancelled, so I would be a hypocrite for defending donations to MF.

    I also have a more hard-line position on MF; they've turned into a shitty, corrupt American tech company imitation. All open source foundations based in the US are suspect by definition (including Linux foundation, Debian foundation etc.) as US society is in a state where it is extremely unlikely that crime and corruption will be addressed in the next 20 years (I've lived in the US for several years, as well as other countries across NA, Europe and Asia).

    But that doesn't mean you should trust an individual like XLE, who muddies the water with bombastic BS, while at the same time defending Brave; an American criminal gang that was caught re-writing referral URLs for their own financial benefit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    You linked to me praising Waterfox, which is a Firefox fork, for blocking ads by default with a method that's faster than with extensions.

    I listed six sponsored things people will see on a new Firefox installation, things you admitted you don't see because you run a "heavily customized" copy of it. You can claim I don't know what I'm talking about, but things don't stop being ads just because you don't see don't mind them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I stand by what I said. I will let people read my comment in this thread and our comments in this post (there are multiple threads that are relevant):

    https://piefed.social/c/opensource/p/1952631/waterfox-to-integrate-brave-adblock-engine-with-search-ads-enabled-by-default

    Let people make up their own minds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    What are people supposed to see? That you nitpicked my statements, accused me of not addressing every nitpick, and when I finally did... You decided to leave and then continue the argument here (not addressed to me but specifically complaining about that detail)?

    Seems way more like you're just dredging up days-old personal drama disguised as a callout post.

    For the record, I'm not a fan of Brave and its bigotry and unethical practices, and that extends to every company that engages in the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Honestly it's been what.. 8? Years since chrome could play HDR..

    Firefox

    Just make it work already.. it kinda does on Linux if you enable experimental features just..do it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Every time I have tried enabling HDR on a monitor/TV/game, I end up turning it back off soon after. I can never seem to find a good balance of bright and dark; one of them is always off for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I got my first OLED monitor a few days ago, and was excited to try HDR out.

    I have no idea what HDR is really supposed to look like, but Windows’ version or implementation of HDR is garbage. My icons on just my taskbar looked so incredibly washed out I worried I made a mistake getting the monitor itself.

    Turned off HDR and noticed colors popping again. The hell is so special about HDR..? lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    This logo reminds me of Nullsoft Winamp

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 51 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    God dammit. All the whining they do about needing donations to keep developing and this is what they come up with.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Sounds like this is in the same space as OpenWebUI? It would be good to have some more choice there.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

    It sounds like a step further than open-webui; it’s an enterprise grade client-server model for access to agents, workflows, and centralized knowledge repositories for RAG.

    In addition to local chatbot for executive/admin use, I can see this being the backend for developers running Cursor or some other AI enhanced IDE, with local knowledge stores holding proprietary documents and running against local large models.

    I am also curious about time share and prioritization of resources; I assume it would queue simultaneous requests. Presumably this would let you more effectively pool local compute, rather than providing A100 GPUs to each developer that may sit unused when they’re not working.

    Edit: Somewhat impressively, this whole stack does not even include a local inference provider; so it does everything except local models right now, and requests are forwarded to cloud inference providers (Anthropic, OpenAI, etc). But it does have the backend started for rate limiting and queuing, and true “fully offline/local” is on the roadmap, just not there yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    After reading through the GitHub docs, the most impressive thing is that they open sourced their Thunderbolt coding agent for Claude Code. There are quite a few skills available for implementation planning, dependency/build environment setup, coding, linting/cleanup, QA, and managing agent pull requests. Pretty good examples if you are looking at building Claude Code skills.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago*

    Where are you seeing that it's useable for RAG? I've gone through the github and not seeing anyting very specific that way.

    Edit: good lord their documentation is shit. Spend a few tokens on a proper mkdocs site or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 6 months ago

    At last a useful comment thread about the actual functionality in question.

    While I am not moving back to reddit, Threadiverse is just terrible on any nuanced conversations on modern ML tools and approaches.

    The tech is not the issue here. It has legitimate use cases and it is here to stay (this is not a blockchain pump and dump scheme ala Web 3.0). The issue here are American tech companies and broader support for crime/corruption in US society (as of today, doesn't mean that this can't/won't change in 20-30 years). We need truly independent open source systems and tools.

    I am aware OpenWebUI is based in San Francisco and Mozilla Foundation is based in the US. I am always on the lookout for alternatives.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    It looks like it, it doesn't seem to be doing any self-referencing/agentic things out of the box so the end user would need to build a bit to cover their specific use cases.

    They seem to be aiming more at the startup/small company demographic than at self-hosters. This is just based on a skim of the repo and their product page, I haven't looked at it too hard yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 6 months ago* (24 children)

     “Organizations are recognizing that AI is too important to outsource.” RYAN SIPES, CEO, MZLA TECHNOLOGIES

      Thunderbolt is a product of MZLA Technologies Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Mozilla Foundation.

    Well guys... It's endorsed by the CEO.

    so there's that

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] [S] 17 points 6 months ago (22 children)

    Omg take my money!! 💸💸💸💸

    Seriously loosing whatever faith i had left in Mozilla... I want to love them so badly, but this just hurts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 6 months ago (21 children)

    Oh no, they wrote a free program that you don't want to use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 6 months ago (19 children)

    I see your account is just here to troll/harass people who don't love AI too, but we're witnessing Mozilla burning goodwill and capital for no apparent reason.

    Please don't tell people to stick their heads in the sand.

    Advocacy against Mozilla's waste has already gotten them nervous and defensive, and that advocacy can and should continue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [+] -16 points 6 months ago* (18 children)

    Really, you're going to follow me around calling me a troll? That's sadder than being a troll.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (17 children)

    Nah, what's sadder is getting ratioed like this for being an AI shill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 6 months ago (16 children)

    You care about Karma points? On the Fediverse, even?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (15 children)

    I care about the sentiment, not the points.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago (14 children)

    Okay, so you only want to say things that are popular within a community, and you consider people who say things that are unpopular to be "trolls" that should be excluded from that community.

    This is what makes social media into self-reinforcing information bubbles and leads people to be out of touch with the general public. Like this Thunderbolt tool - if "nobody asked for this", as another commenter in this thread said, why do you think it was made? There's actually a lot of demand for AI tools in the real world but communities like this one create narratives that convinced themselves that it's all some kind of delusional grift with unclear motives. When someone like me comes along that challenges that narrative, ooh, troll. Downvote and drive out! And you wonder why everyone left seems to agree?

    You should really just block me if you don't want to hear my views. I suppose you could report me to the mods if you think I've actually broken any rules, but that normally requires a bit more backing it up than just disagreeing with my opinion or thinking it's unpopular. Otherwise you're just going to waste your time and make yourself unhappy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago* (8 children)

    Facedeer, if you don't want people to see you as a troll, don't complain about "apocalyptic" rhetoric around AI job loss one day, then say people are in "denial" if they don't believe it the next day.

    In other words, don't be a troll.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    In other words, "don't have an opinion about AI that's different from mine."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Facedeer, posting two contradictory things is not "having an opinon." It is trolling.

    You should try having an opinion, and even sticking to the topic (addressing Mozilla's waste instead of bloviating about some vague virtue of the right to speech ). It would be so much more interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    What's contradictory? A lot of people in that thread about AI capabilities were in denial. A lot of other people are making apocalyptic statements.

    See that "other people" thing? Different people have different opinions and react differently. That's the point I'm making here, too. Not everyone hates this AI tool that Mozilla has put out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    FaceDeer, don't act dumb. You clearly went into both threads to attack and name-call anybody who doesn't criticize AI under your ill-defined, ever-shifting standards. So your attacks ended up contradictory and hypocritical.

    And now you're here to defend Mozilla waste by suggesting there are people who totally wanted it. (Are they in the room with you right now?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago* (3 children)

    And now you're here to defend Mozilla waste by suggesting there are people who totally wanted it. (Are they in the room with you right now?)

    FauxLiving, harmburgler, Avid Amoeba, and CyberSeeker are discussing it in positive terms elsewhere in this very thread. 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘 had a more cautiously open view. So yes, they are in the "room" with us right now.

    Since you care about upvotes, note that many of my comments here have garnered a decent number of those too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    You ignored the first half of my statement. Noted.

    To the second half: show me where they asked Mozilla to spend money on it before Mozilla did. Otherwise you misinterpreted what I wrote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I ignored the first half of your statement because it was just pointless badmouthing of me.

    I'm ignoring the rest of your comment because it's a weird goalpost shift. Why would Mozilla ask a bunch of random people on the Fediverse what they want? You're upset because they didn't personally ask you what to do?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    You can't name anyone who asked for this thing that Mozilla is burning money on? Noted.

    Don't be so quick to confidently name names, then. Including with the weird "karma" accusation you tried throwing at me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

    This is what makes social media into self-reinforcing information bubbles and leads people to be out of touch with the general public.

    There’s actually a lot of demand for AI tools in the real world but communities like this one create narratives that convinced themselves that it’s all some kind of delusional grift with unclear motives.

    100%

    It's one thing to be against the rampant capitalist orgy around AI that's disrupting markets and driving up energy costs. I agree with that sentiment. I also agree that there are questions around copyright and said capitalists have stolen a lot of work from people.

    That being said, it's complete nonsense to take that gripe and then pretend that every possible use of Transformer-based neural networks is evil and useless.

    Yes, there are aspects of the creation of commercial Large Language Models and Diffusion Models that are immoral and should be criticized, but if somebody's kneejerk reaction is to hate everything that says 'AI' then they're no different than the anti-vaxxers or election deniers or any other people who let social media do their thinking for them.

    People are upset at all of the datacenters being created and also are upset when there are self-hosting tools being created, where's the logic in that? What is the actual position held by you people other than: 'see AI, downvote'?

    Ratio doesn't mean right. This is so obvious, that you (@call_me_xale@lemmy.zip) should feel shame that you even made that comment.

    I know you wont, though, you must be right because look at the RATIO! That's how you know how right you are, correct? After all, there is no need to actually make any kind of rational argument or attempt to participate in the discussion in any meaningful way, just find the right clapback and watch the ratio.

    The same with the conspiratorial personal attack. They don't share your opinion so they're a secret plant by the AI industry? Really? Conspiratorial and paranoid delusions are not a substitute for a rational opinion, no matter what the ratio says or how self-righteous you feel when you press the submit button.

    I look forward to your response. If I could make a suggestion, perhaps try insinuating that @FaceDeer@fedia.io and I are the same person on alt accounts, that one always gets good ratio. Maybe a single emoji reply, the effort:ratio ratio on that one is pretty good. I have a pretty considerable comment history, maybe you can find something in there. Though you could also go with not replying, I mean after all this is wayyyy down the comment chain so you may not find the attention that you're seeking.

    Put some effort into your snark and show a little originality. Repeating the "L ratio" meme is tired af.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago* (1 child)

    FauxLiving, being another AI advocate who's just here to troll and spread snark doesn't make you special.

    Nor does pretending you have a special opinion while not only failing to provide it, but instead attacking people who disagree with you. But with flair. Here's a tip: address what's discussed, instead of bloviating about diversity of thought or making baseless accusations towards people who disagree with you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    My dude, while I appreciate the 'just a tip' angle of your snark, I have been arguing with people on the Internet longer than you have been breathing, so just let me cook and enjoy the ride.

    A guy, who has no ability to program, announcing a fork of a major project deserves to be mocked. If you read that as advocating AI, then that's certainly a decision and I applaud your bravery in standing up for idiots.

    e: oh no my ratio

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Thunderbird team unveils... 🙂 thunderbolt... 😃self-hostable... 🤯AI😒client 😓

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Idk why they tied it to the Thunderbird name but cool I guess

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    literally all they had to do was maintain the good old status quo and everyone would have loved them for it

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Does this have anything to do with Thunderbird? I'm confused.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I want to be able to login to my m365 work account without Owl (but I do love you for filling the gap Owl). Why weren't these resources spent on making that a reality? Thats twenty times more useful for Thunderbird and its users.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    Supposedly, this is a new and different team that will be taking a grant from the Mozilla Foundation. (I have no idea where these new resources came from, but in the best case scenario, they will appear out of thin air and not slow down work on Thunderbird...)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Is this a potential alternative to Open Web UI?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    I'm note sure anybody asked for this.

    That said, I'll give it a shot.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    I can get behind this concept for those that want email summaries, I suppose. But absolutely not from a donation run nonprofit who was told time and again that we do not want ai shoved in every orifice.

    Edit. Autocorrect

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago*

    However an AI by a nonprofit is the only kind of AI I would potentially use.

    I'm not against the LLM tech, it's that by using it I would support the shittiest of megacorps that use their power for evil (from training data to direct politics, and let's not forget markets disruptions).

    AI by a for-profit has guaranteed enshitification built into the business model, otherwise they wouldn't get any capital.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago*

    Could you explain what email summaries have to do with this announcement? Thunderbird and Thunderbolt are separate applications. Thunderbolt doesn't include AI models, it is merely a frontend to an AI API of choice, similar to how Thunderbird is a frontend to an email server of choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    And this is yet another reason why I use Betterbird.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Because of a separate app that doesn't affect Thunderbird in day to day use? What?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Even if it's shit, why does Mozilla think it's going to beat the rest?

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago
    [–] 0 points 6 months ago

    So like, another open source competitor to LM Studio and OpenWebUI? Roadmap lists Ollama support. Honestly, this is pretty cool. I'm not sure what all the whinging in this thread is about. Are y'all mad because it's AI related? This is specifically a tool for you to use AI without needing to pay the data centers or the proprietary enterprise AI companies... Self hosting an LLM is exactly what we should be doing with it.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago

    Prepare to be sued by Apple? I know one is LLM and the other is an interface standard. Not a great choice of a name I may say.

  • source