top 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 168 points 6 months ago (1 child)

Shocking. Absolutely riveting outcome that wasn't expected whatsoever. /s

That being said though, the weirder part for me is the fact that apparently they weren't able to obtain the operatives behind the website. So this was essentially a court case that was filed, put into session and then given judgment without even ever identifying the defendants that are on trial.

That seems really weird to me.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 138 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Hopefully non-US registrars and governments will stand up to this abuse.

    Those labels didn't suffer any damage. That's all money to line their pockets and push more AI slop, not to benefit human creators.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 100 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    On the bright side, they're unlikely to see a penny from it, and have incurred lawyer costs and time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    True. Hopefully they spent lots on outside law firms. They'll get paid unless they stupidly said they'll just take a cut of the damages, like injury firms do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago

    It's likely already budgeted for, so if it wasn't used for this attack, it would have gone to another fruitless attack. It's how they do business these days. The money isn't important. It's keeping the illusion of risk to pirating and thus illusion of value of their product. Basically, part of their marketing budget.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    AFAIK they haven't even posted the music. Only the metadata.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Don't they need to find the owner to actually do the fine?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Or they'll have an excuse to go hard core after them on an international level, because they are now wanted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    bro these freaks would better be paying more to their artists instead of lawyers to sue anonymous mfs who don't even care💀

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 6 months ago

    Meanwhile, on Epstein Island...

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Tl;dr: It's "give us $300 million (which we know you won't do), or we'll order everyone involved in hosting your site to give up your name and address."

    For now, the monetary judgment is mostly a victory on paper, as recouping money from an unknown entity is impossible. For this reason, the music companies also requested a permanent injunction.

    Permanent Injunction Targets Domains In addition to the damages award, Rakoff entered a permanent worldwide injunction covering ten Anna’s Archive domains: annas-archive.org, .li, .se, .in, .pm, .gl, .ch, .pk, .gd, and .vg.

    Domain registries and registrars of record, along with hosting and internet service providers, are ordered to permanently disable access to those domains, disable authoritative nameservers, cease hosting services, and preserve evidence that could identify the site’s operators.

    The judgment names specific third parties bound by those obligations, including Public Interest Registry, Cloudflare, Switch Foundation, The Swedish Internet Foundation, Njalla SRL, IQWeb FZ-LLC, Immaterialism Ltd., Hosting Concepts B.V., Tucows Domains Inc., and OwnRegistrar, Inc.

    Anna’s Archive is also ordered to destroy all copies of works scraped from Spotify and to file a compliance report within ten business days, under penalty of perjury, including valid contact information for the site and its managing agents. That last requirement could prove significant, given that the identity of the site’s operators remains unknown.

    A Way Out, at a Price In theory, Anna’s Archive has the option to prevent the domain suspension. The permanent injunction allows the site to seek relief from this measure, after showing that it has paid the full $322 million damages award and complied with all injunctive obligations.

    That’s an unlikely option, to say the least. At the same time, however, it is not guaranteed that the site’s domain names will be suspended.

    As reported previously, several domain names, including the Greenland-based .gl version, are linked to registries and registrars outside the jurisdiction of the U.S. court. As such, they previously did not comply to the preliminary injunction, and it is unknown whether the latest order changes that.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 25 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    Spotify and record labels have headquarters…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    …and making molotovs is easy, from what I hear.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

    I recently had this conversation in another community and realized that I have too much to lose. 💀 How about just keep seeding? 🤣

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    They have names and addresses

    You do realize there are things you can do other than kill them? With a megaphone a caltrop a flaming bag of dog shit a hammer a really strong speaker...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    Time to get an onion?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    What damages? Did people stop paying for their subscription because of the site having metadata? This is fucking pathetic... If people cancel their subscription because of the law suit will the lawyers he forced to sue themselves for damages?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago*

    default judgment against the unknown operators of Anna's Archive.

    So isn't this kinda like raising their fists up to the sky and screaming "reeeeeeeee!!"? They don't even know who they were suing. lol

    I'm hoping it has no effect, since I use Anna's Archive almost every single day.

  • source
  • 91 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    7 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    6 comments in c/technology@piefed.social view that post
    1 comment in c/legalnews@lemmy.zip view that post