top 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 58 points 7 months ago (11 children)

I'm a dumb American and don't know who this is. He didn't really do that did he? What the fuck is going on.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 7 months ago

    Codified the concept on lessaiz faire economics giving a pseudo-academic justification for the Reaganite and Thatcherite fiscal policies that are broadly responsible for the sorry state of public services in America and Britain today.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 82 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    He's one of the fathers of neoliberalism, and therefore a lot of the problems we all face today

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 24 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Neoliberalism would have come one way or the other.

    That's a part of the lie that "capitalism is inevitable."

    It's not. Just because the world is a certain way for a time, doesn't mean it has to be, and the world is never done changing and evolving.

    The world we live in today is the result of millions of decisions that humans have made. Collective decisions, individual decisions, competing decisions, strategic decisions. It all adds up and substracts and the net result is the world we have today.

    Capitalism isn't inevitable. Oligarchs only want you to believe that so you accept it as the so-called "real world."

    Maybe Friedman wasn't the guy that made neoliberalism the dominant system today, but if we didn't have Reagan or Thatcher, we wouldn't have austerity for the poor and "trickle-down" supply-side economics as the main standard methods of political economy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 7 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I never claimed that neoliberalism is what gave us capitalism. What's with people arguing against points I never made?

    I said claiming that "we would have neoliberalism one way or another" is a part of the lie that "capitalism is inevitable." Nothing you said refutes that.

    but if we didn’t have Reagan or Thatcher

    Great man/woman theory.

    Not at all. Heads of state of influential world superpowers absolutely have a disproportionate effect on the development of the world for decades and even generations after their time in office.

    If you can't see that, then I guess you believe the world is purely deterministic and human choice doesn't matter, so then I guess you're also a nihilist who says we shouldn't vote or fight for climate action or even resist fascism, because apparently the people in power don't matter, and human choices don't matter, so why the fuck should anyone try to make a difference anyway?

    I guess we can't hold anyone in power accountable for the results of their decisions, because that would be "great man/woman" fallacy, right? Let's all stay in bed and drink ourselves into comas, because capitalism and neoliberalism aren't the results of human choices, but somehow some inevitable part of existence itself.

    Go home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago

    This has "why are there so many people standing around on construction sites?" vibes

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    The Nazis did the same with their highways to keep people employed.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    US does it with their health industry, more administrators then doctors, also their military industrial complex , which is why they need forever wars to create jobs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago

    I mean maybe shovels created exactly the right amount of jobs

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago

    By far the most popular and prolific flat earther

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    FWIW,

    wp:Milton Friedman#Foreign policy

    He supported US involvement in the Second World War and initially supported a hard-line against Communism, but moderated over time.[149] However, Friedman did state in a 1995 interview that he was an anti-interventionist.[150] He opposed the Gulf War and the Iraq War. In a spring 2006 interview, Friedman said the US's stature in the world had been eroded by the Iraq War, but that it might be improved if Iraq were to become a peaceful and independent country.[151][149]

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Pointing out someone else’s retarded policy doesn’t mean yours are any better

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago

    He thought he made a smart and funny joke. Just shows his arrogance

  • source