top 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 87 points 7 months ago

FuckDenuvo. Let's see to which lengths they'll go to block hypervisor.

  • source
  • [–] 58 points 7 months ago

    lol, get rekd, malware.

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 7 months ago

    Lmao, fucking fantastic. Hope they crash and burn.

  • source
  • [–] 60 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    This crack sounds too scary to use. Impressive, but scary.

    As usual for any DRM company or publisher, Irdeto also claimed that downloading games with the bypass is a security concern, but this time around, the company has a valid point.

    Using the hypervisor bypass, even in its latest incarnation, requires users to... [install] a community-made hypervisor (HV) with Windows running on top of it. This HV fakes responses to the checks that Denuvo makes, and runs with higher permissions... than the operating system itself and has full, nearly untraceable access to hardware and software.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    If you think that’s scary wait til you hear about what it’s circumventing is capable of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 7 months ago

    On a technical level..... Less.

    The exploit completely guts and opens up your system to pretty much anything. More access than even denovo.

    Use the included scripts (or manually do it yourself or make your own script) to re enable everything after you're done playing the game and reboot the system. I'd also leave the router unplugged while you play. This denovo bypass seriously leaves your system super unsecured. Only get your games using this exploit from very trusted sources and don't be lazy about enabling everything again and rebooting before plugging back into the internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    I wouldn't touch this without air-gapping the machine it's run on. The funny thing here is that Denuvo can't do much to prevent this hack.

    The HV is intentionally malicious and modifies the guest on the fly to archive the Denuvo hack. The hack requires to disable all major security protections in the victim OS, so the HV can more freely poke at the victim kernel. A jne-instruction to check if running under a compromised HV? It's now a nop-instruction.

    The HV has access to everything that is plugged in physically, or run on top of it. In theory it e.g. extract encryption keys of https connections from any process in the guest.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Well, you could potentially get a cheap office special PC to use as a guinea pig. (Depending on what it takes to run this software)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago

    The problem with well-coded malware is it won't execute unless it thinks it's not being watched. And based on everything else in this article, it sounds like you'd also be opening your computer up to other parties exploiting security holes in the process.

    So a separate computer might work, but it would have to stay separate.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago
    [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    Finally get to check out Black Myth. Still won't buy it until it just doesn't have Denuvo at all, tho.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago*

    Hypervisor is too much of a security risk for me to want to use it. I'll either get the game without Denuvo on console, wait for it to be removed, or not play it at all.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    Sounds useful for reverse-engineering use but impractical for end users.

  • source
  • [+] -16 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    There is 0 details on specifics of how Denuvo was broken. Article goes into detail why Denuvo is bad and not much more (which is also debatable because vast majority of Denuvo implementations do not cause performance impact).

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Every single aspect of DRM, whether it is denuvo or otherwise, is either neutral or negative for the end user.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    Correct but irrelevant to what I’ve said, which is that the performance impact of Denuvo is usually minimal. There’s a couple of very bad cases that got a lot of publicity but there’s boatloads of Denuvo games running fine.

    It’s cool Denuvo was cracked. It’ll be fixed eventually and the never ending game of cat and mouse continues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    It's not about performance for me. I'm not paying for a single player offline game that requires internet. I was around for the Spore DRM. That started with 3 activations and having to call EA for more. Even the current 5 activations per day is too restrictive, as I've heard changing proton version counts as an activation. If I don't own it (yes technically you don't steam games, but I think I could easily bypass steam protection and still play my games if it came down to it) I'm not buying it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    article goes into why Denuvo is bad but not much more (which is debatable...

    I mentioned why denuvo is bad. I wasn't replying specifically to your argument about performance, because that's only a slice of the reason why denuvo is bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • 51 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    43 comments in c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    1 comment in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post