all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 54 points 7 months ago (1 child)

Look like good changes to me. There was nothing wrong with Mastodon, but sometimes you really had to have been a Mastodon user already to know how it works.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    especially for more mainstream users looking for an alternative to X or Threads.

    That many people use Facebook Threads? That sounds like saying "especially for more mainstream users looking for an alternative to Reddit or New Digg."

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    People were autoregistered for threads if they already had an account for instagram or facebook iirc. It also auto reposts stuff between those services unless you turn it off i think. They just forcefully injected content from their other platforms to kickstart it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    X and threads are Microblog pages, seems plausible to me to use them as a comparison. It's the platforms we want to migrate people from to mastodon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    I agree, rather I was surprised that threads grew big enough for people to be trying to migrate away from it.

    In my area / friend circles, I don't know anyone that continued to use Threads after the initial launch. However, there are people using Mastodon, Bluesky, and Twitter

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Changes look good but god dam I hate the discourse around fediverse software its like pulling teeth.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    Mastodon project needs to fix how authentication is handled across user instances. This confuses newbies because they click a link and wind up at a remote server where they're not authenticated, and don't even realize it.

    This divide is problematic across ActivityPub. Hubzilla and zot fixed that problem years ago.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    Realistic demo page: 5 posts, 0 interactions

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    The mastodon people just posted this too. It's the designer's perspective.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNxpTvbTy54

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago

    Authentication friction is exactly the kind of invisible barrier that kills adoption. New users click a link and suddenly they are at a different server without warning. That is not just confusing, it is a fundamental UX failure.

  • source
  • [+] -16 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    "Its social network"? Ewwww...

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I don’t think it’s too much for the company that makes mastodon to claim mastodon is “it’s decentralised social network”. The way I read it they don’t claim ownership, they claim to be the author.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Mastodon didn't invent ActivityPub or the Fediverse by a long shot. So calling it their social network makes me throw up a little in my mouth...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    No, they invented mastodon. Which is the thing they’re adjusting.

    They didn’t invent HTTP either, which they’re not claiming ownership of by using it in mastodon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -16 points 7 months ago

    Mastodon is a specific software operating within the Fediverse social network, nothing it has done has made it "its own thing". But I'll stop arguing as it's clearly pointless.

  • source
  • parent