New York City Mayor Mamdani is revolutionizing government efficiency by cutting wasteful contracts with companies like McKinsey, saving millions without compromising essential services. Will this progressive approach inspire a national movement against inefficient outsourcing?

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 21 points 7 months ago (1 child)

McKinsey charge heavily to ask to borrow your watch, to tell you the time. The time given will be retrospective.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago

    Consulting firms like McKinsey are cancer. And never good for anyone

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago

    One of our biggest retailers here started working with McKensey. They went from great to shitty in 2 years. Closed hundrets of specialized shops to "focus on core competencies". Fuck those people!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    That's awesome. With their ghoulish track record they should be unwelcome everywhere.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Fuck McKinsey and never ever let Mayo Pete near presidential power.

  • source
  • [+] -6 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Cool, cool. How much will it end up costing the City to replace those workers and the tasks they were doing? The need for people and services done isn't going away. The reason the City first started employing private firms is because the taxpayers wouldn't have to be on the hook for those salaries, and more importantly, those pensions. Insourcing for the city just shifts the burden from a contract fee now to having to fund another pension in a few years.

    I'm not saying it's a bad thing. I like the idea of NYC actually employing people again. It helps build confidence in the city government that it won't collapse if a single contract negotiation falls through. It means the whole City isn't held hostage by a private corp that can raise rates whenever it chooses. There's positives to direct hire. But it will be a bite in the hindquarters when the pensions come due, and the salaries may well exceed the consulting contract.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 18 points 7 months ago*

    McKinsey has contracted with the New York City government several times, including between 2014-17 when it was paid $27.5 million to reduce violence at the jail complex on Rikers Island—only to report “bogus” numbers as the problem worsened—and in 2022 when it was paid $1.6 million to research garbage disposal.

    They weren't doing shit. It's simple stealing that's being cut off.

  • source
  • parent
  • 14 comments in c/nottheonion@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 119 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    between 2014-17 when it was paid $27.5 million to reduce violence at the jail complex on Rikers Island—only to report “bogus” numbers as the problem worsened

    Ah precious consultants..

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 7 months ago

    Hell yes! Imagine how much snow can be cleared and potholes can be filled with that "consulting" money

  • source
  • [–] 82 points 7 months ago

    Straight male here.

    Mamdani's policies make me hard!

  • source
  • [–] 64 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I’m surprised NYC outsourced its entire IT. If it were a town of 25k that might make sense, but not one of the largest governments in the world.

    They are big enough to hire OS devs and run their own Linux distro

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago

    It's not entirely outsourced by any means. There is a lot of it. The article is discussing one department that was outsourced, many others are not.

    Regarding running their own Linux distro, that probably would be neither cheap or really helpful (which of their vendors would support that vs. some other distro in practice?) but yes, there is a sizeable IT footprint required for such a large place.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Dealing with government contracts, a lot of governments prefer to outsource some activities when the private market can provide these services. The idea is that it makes it easier to fire individual non-performers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    The real idea is that it shift liability for issues from the politicians to private companies who aren't beholden to anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Not really. Politicians have a lot of control over those contacts and they are written to benefit the government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Damn, Mamdani still be bringing that campaigning rizz even in office

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 1 comment in c/lefty_news@ibbit.at view that post
    [–] 17 points 7 months ago

    This is the way.

  • source