cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/61222180

all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

No way someone is this dimwitted. This is fake, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 60 comments in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 188 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    "Iran is run by theocratic psychopaths who only understand the language of violence!"

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    And they marry children instead of just molesting them like an upstanding Christian!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago* (4 children)

    Child marriage is legal in most US states.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    ...but it's okay to rape them though....crazy F%$KS!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    And wouldn't you know it? The same states where child marriage is legal are also states where marital rape is treated as legally distinct from non-marital rape. In Iowa, for example, subsection (2) of article 709.4 Sexual abuse in third degree, excludes sexual acts committed by adults with children as young as 12, provided the parties are "cohabiting as husband and wife."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    God damn, not even the Vatican has laws like that now. Their age of consent went from 12 to 18 recently. I believe the marriage exception got raised to 14, which is still kind of wild, but not Iowa levels. Many of those laws are in place for, and exceptional to, accomodating marriages that occured in a culture where it is acceptable but the marriage is obviously no longer in that country/culture.

    For those that consider marriage "a thing" these laws are intended to balance the respect of marriage and respect the immaturity of a young mind and body. For those, like me, that recognise there is literally no purpose for marriage, they're entirely insane laws to go that low.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 53 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    This is nonsense.

    Potatoes have an INCREDIBLE amount of self-awareness for something without a nervous system.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 53 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)
  • [–] -2 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 51 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    No, he just doesn’t count you as people.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 64 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Coulda funded the healthcare subsidies twice over for the 200b they're asking for

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    They could fund a public healthcare system twice over with the money the federal government is already spending providing piece meal health care through several inefficient programs. The war crime fund could solve the housing problem though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    Th government is using health care to force people to continue working. They know they can fund it. They also know if healthcare becomes free in the US, there are lots of people who can just stop working. If they made healthcare free I'd likely be able to stop working by age 45

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Iran has healthcare, you don't

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 64 points 7 months ago* (4 children)

    Tbf it's not exactly same as US. Iran is using those weapons in self-defense instead of invading random countries an ocean + sea + two geographic regions away.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    Also, we're apparently low on munitions, so we're failing at even spending our money on that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    No wonder the Pentagon hasn't passed an audit in a decade or something!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Actually the reason is the US uses 3M$ anti-missile missiles to intercept 20k$ drones. It was obvious from the start they would run out of them way while Iran would keep producing more of their drones (plus the ones they get from Russia).

    It's quite unbelievable they the US were so confident in their capabilities they didn't bother to learn anything from the war in Ukraine, where swarms of cheap drones have replaced advanced but costly missiles for years now.

    So the money may be genuinely used on weapons (and well, lobsters and steaks…). It's just spent stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I'm not fron usa but did he literally said that?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago

    I would love it if Iran asked Pete Hegseth to check with the 2006 Time Magazine person of the year with who does that to their country/citizens.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    From the creator of:

    "We're fighting religious fanatics who seek a nuclear capability in order for some religious Armageddon"

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago

    Does this dipshit realize he'll never be safe in public again? Probably anywhere on Earth.

    And I don't think he gets lifetime tax payer funded Secret Service protection like America is prepared to give a felon rapist pedophile.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Does he hear himself? Like I feel like we're living in a sketch show.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    Tell me this motherfucker did not actually say this with a straight face

    Edit: He did.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    No way he actually said that xD

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (1 child)
    [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    Fucking moron.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    It’s mockery. He knows there are no consequences for him, these press briefings are just going through the motions.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago

    islamic republic of iran, is largely ther because of USA/UK when they installed the shah.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    They truly have reached the same point that Putin has, where you can invert any statement of theirs to get the actual truth

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    Why he gotta speak ill of the potato

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Every time I see Hegseths face I am glad it is not Matthew Miller

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    "Do you have an irony deficiency?"- Joseph in The Handmaid's Tale

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago
    [–] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Who is "he" and what did he say?

    This feels like a post that should include a link or an image...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 8 comments in c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 25 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    To be fair, US spending money on weapons isn't the reason you don't have the social services the rest of us have.

    It's due to malice and corruption.

    Remember, you're paying (in both Tax contributions AND private insurance) DOUBLE the amount for your not public, not universal healthcare than the rest of us do.

    I swear the whole 'if we didn't make bombs we could afford healthcare' and the conservative obverse of 'if we weren't paying for NATO we could afford healthcare' dual shticks are designed to keep you from actually questioning why the hell you're paying DOUBLE what everyone else does on Healthcare for less service.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    From my POV, the "if we didnt spend so much on military we could have healthcare" argument boils down to someone holding 2 opinions and presenting it as 1.

    Opinion 1: War is bad, we should spend less money on the military and stop creating new wars

    Opinion 2: Healthcare should be government subsidized (Universal Healthcare). If we are already anti-war, let's put the savings from not doing war into healthcare.

    I understand your point completely though. Most Americans are paying more than their fair share, while the oligarchy clan pays less than one of us at the bottom. We (the 99%) should be able to get healthcare by taxing appropriately and getting rid of the corruption at the top. It shouldnt be tied to military spending.

    I think what you're saying is correct. It "widens the lens" of the issues out to the system being corrupt which is completely true. I dont think most people have faith we can fix the system (at least within the next 2-6 years), so we are coping with smaller thoughts of just having the option to be anti war and pro UHC.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    This way you'll lose support of those people who do not think war is bad.

    We are already spending too much for healthcare and should switch to public healthcare even just to decrease our spending seems an argument that the vast majority of people can agree with, regardless of their ideas on other topics.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    It definitely is possible for a country to have expensive explodey toys and proper healthcare, food and housing, if the system was public, with minimal corruption and wealth appropriately taxed to fund it...

    I bring up the argument "we could fund x instead of $y on military" because I think it helps give people a sense of the scale of the huge cost of war. Trump is asking for $200 billion from Congress for his Middle East excursion (so far), that amount can more than eliminate hunger and homelessness.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago*

    Yeah, that comment hit me in the nuts too.

    The US is about to hit 20 years of the federal minimum wage being $7 an hour and change. 2/3 of the US states still adhere to it as their standard, and several states have laws against local municipalities enacting their own local wage laws.

    Meanwhile the war budget (and let's be honest, calling it a 'defense' budget is bullshit) has increased by a few percentage points every single year since 2001.

    The poverty here is by design, same as it's always been.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Bless his heart. His self awareness was surgically removed when he was a baby.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    "Do you have an irony deficiency?"- Joseph in the Handmaid's Tale

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/noncrediblediplomacy@sh.itjust.works view that post
    [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    EVERY single republican "argument:"

  • source