all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 7 months ago

Then I guess I'm both happy and sad.

Happy its finally reached its inevitable end.

Sad they had $80 billion to waste.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago*

    Meta is killing its Metaverse, not the Metaverse.
    Remember: they don't own the concept, no matter how much they'd like you to believe they do.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Snow Crash is satire. Zuck didn't get the joke.

    The 1980s view of cyberspace was disembodied techno-warlocks soaring through floating numbers to avoid getting their brains melted by anti-intrusion software. Neal Stephenson turned that into a mall.

    Second Life also built that torment nexus, but just the 3D rendered MUSH part. They parted out infinite virtual space into a cramped trailer park waaay before Decentraland's cocaine fantasy version. SL's users were like half trans furries and half the most basic bitch dolled-up human avatars, who on reflection probably had even worse body-image issues than the trans furries. This is all to say that the average user was horny in a way that the modern web cannot reflect. I don't know if VR Chat properly captured that, but I'm certain Horizon Worlds fucked it up, because avatars don't exist below the waist.

    Well. Didn't.

  • source
  • 28 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 29 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago

    You're telling me businesses didn't want to hold meetings in Second Life and consumers didn't want Facebook harvesting data?

    I'm shocked, I say. Shocked!

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    To all those who vehemently shouted me down when I pointed out how utterly stupid an idea this was when they announced it, who were convinced that the amount of money they were throwing at it garaunteed success, I issue a heartfelt: ha. ha.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I don't remember a single person who was enthusiastic about this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    Reddit had plenty of shills. Hell like a month or two ago when they announced another setback there were people here saying it was a good idea but they had given up on it.

    So, I do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Ever thought about that those could be bots??

    Also I could also say something like “for those that shot me down for saying the earth isn’t flat, suck it!”. While those people do exist they are an insignificant minority

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    Out of the frying pan…

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    Would have been much cheaper to partner with VRchat, no?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    that was just a play so clueless speculators think that facebook is still a growth company, justifying their insane P/E. it don't matter the money "burned" as long the derivatives are booming. they didn't lose shit, this don't touch them in the slightest.

    even now, this isn't pushed as defeat, it's used as an opportunity to bolster their new play - ai.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] [S] 12 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    wonder when software devs will get serious about unionizing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (10 children)

    this will never happen in the current landscape; it's controlled by libertarian & neoliberal people who detest collectivism in all of its forms.

    and toxically so, my psychological well being has improve dramatically ever since leaving the field.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    I really think it'll depend on how bad the employment situation gets. At some point people are going to start realizing they're not temporarily inconvenienced billionaires, and that their interests aren't aligned with the oligarchs. Software devs have been largely insulated from general economic problems until recently. Getting a job has been relatively easy, the pay was way above what most people make, and that fed individualistic behavior. Now that jobs are becoming scarce, and there's a huge pool of laid off workers, people are starting to get concerned.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

    those conditions describe the entirety of the united states and, yet, unionization is still abysmally weak.

    and i would expect that an entire field whose members have prided themselves on anti-collectivization would be less apt to adopt a union than any other field.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    I guess we'll see, but I do think people will start adapting to their new reality out of necessity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    to be fair: i agree that it will happen eventually, but it'll come at a time after the americans vote out their political duopoly like the mexicans did to their duopoly back in 2018.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    I love the couple days a week I don’t have to work with software developers, in my experience they generally have a god complex comparable to surgeons, so good luck to the unemployed software developers starting a union I suppose because any of them that stay employed are just going to grow their ego further until it crumbles on top of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    They can't kill the metaverse, it was never theirs.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    no they should keep it open zuck is the best that 80b is just normal operating costs

  • source