They made a sequel to total recall? 😕

FACT CHECK:

Un-shocking tldr: X account is spreading misinfo

Source article: https://www.msn.com/en-us/technology/artificial-intelligence/maga-men-swindled-by-ai-model/ar-AA1Yvein

Original picture (note the human number of mammaries):

You mean the perfect amount?

They put the feet in the shot to distract from the three boobs.

Should have been a giveaway, but those people aren't the sharpest tools in the shed.

I came here to say the same thing. Not tiddies, triddies.

threeddies

First thing I noticed. Like, come ON.

Going to have to try and find the copy I have on VHS with all this Recall talk...

Given how frequently GOP conventions crash grindr, maybe the hetrosexuality is performative and they paid less attention to the boobs than you or I did.

The lighting does look a little weird

Other elements make it look overcast but the lighting on the chest implies direct sunlight partially obscured by the car

"Yes, I know it's paper mâché, I don't care!"

That and the 6 toes

Well there is that thing where for the entirety of my 50 plus years on this Earth, the conservatives have been striving to destroy public education

If we can scam them out of all their money wouldn't that be a win-win?

legit DDG search I just did "best ai generator for " 4th autocomplete was "onlyfans'

We are all chumps. Dumbfucks who work for paychecks all day. The sharks are already crowding each other out in a feeding frenzy for the free money.

Is this how openai will make money?

Yea it's been a thing for a while.

Always could. We used to just call it "pimping"

Wouldn't even be surprised if there are some doing money that way.

Strictly speaking, AI images violate OnlyFans terms of service.

But otherwise, sure. Who was actually harmed here? If she'd been real, would this have been better somehow?

This was edited to make MAGA seem dumber. The original from the article about this has only two tits and is more realistic.

I think most people would be fooled if they saw the original and not this edited version.

Oh, no! My nonexistent support system exists even less!

If you are taking about OnlyFans:

The writer also noted that the "grift" violates OnlyFans' rule that stipulates all accounts must be run by verified humans.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/technology/artificial-intelligence/maga-men-swindled-by-ai-model/ar-AA1Yvein

From: https://lemmy.world/post/44246810/22660472

No idea if they have a policy against it officially, but I doubt it. It would have to be a policy about AI generation specifically since successful OF "users" are definitely going to be registered companies for tax and organization reasons, either with the model directly controlling it or as a business group like traditional porn licensing content. So the content wouldn't match the "user" in those cases. Fake names are pretty standard for anything remotely close to adult for safety reasons as well.

OF wasn't originally created for adult content, it was originally intended to be very general. Tons of bands and similar had OF accounts before it ended up focusing on adult content, many still do because it is a good service setup for exclusive content like that. They were just the platform that didn't cave and crackdown on adult content like other similar services when threatened by payment processors, so all the users went there as it was banned elsewhere.

I totally recall that this is true

This was edited to make MAGA seem dumber. The original from the article about this has only two tits and is more realistic.

I think most people would be fooled if they saw the original and not this edited version.

TWO WEEKS!

And the right side steering wheel on a supposedly US military vehicle...

There’s another picture of her where she’s wearing a skirt and stockings with her feet up on the desk while everyone else (including another female service member) in the room is wearing fatigues. Just consistently out of place.

This was edited to make MAGA seem dumber. The original from the article about this has only two tits and is more realistic.