Too bad their business model is totally whack for personal use.

One time purchase of $139 for 6 months of “support and maintenance” and then $49 a year for driver updates and such.

It’s like they don’t want individuals using it. I’d imagine anyone who would be willing to pay that would be a commercial user with some old software that ArcaOS technically supports. Then it might be worth the price to be able to run said software with newer hardware.

loooong time since i used OS2, thought it would go somewhere, but then I thought the Amiga would and I liked BeOS

wtf would I know :)

Microslop: *messily committing public suicide*
Literally every other OS: "MY DAY HAS COME!"

And I'm not even saying that as a criticism; there has literally never been a better time to make a move in DECADES.

1980s?

80's? I thought it came out around the same time as windowed 95. Or am I thinking of OS/2 Warp?

Now if only the company was willing to make the licensing terms a little friendlier for individual use, or even create an open-core version. We have 9Front and Haiku (and ReactOS), why can't we have a FOSS OS/2?

Microslop: *messily committing public suicide*
Literally every other OS: "MY DAY HAS COME!"

And I'm not even saying that as a criticism; there has literally never been a better time to make a move in DECADES.

80's? I thought it came out around the same time as windowed 95. Or am I thinking of OS/2 Warp?

Now if only the company was willing to make the licensing terms a little friendlier for individual use, or even create an open-core version. We have 9Front and Haiku (and ReactOS), why can't we have a FOSS OS/2?

1980s?

loooong time since i used OS2, thought it would go somewhere, but then I thought the Amiga would and I liked BeOS

wtf would I know :)